We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Weren't Democrats Opposed to 'Christian Nationalism'?
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
NJ Man Charged After Allegedly Biting, Kicking ICE Officers at Newark Detention Facility
James Talarico's Campaign Website Reveals His Radical Immigration Desires
Stephen Colbert's Failed Comedy Act Was Bleeding CBS Dry
EXCLUSIVE: James Talarico's Influence Helped Secure His Vegan Girlfriend a Tax-Payer Funde...
EXCLUSIVE: Karen Bass Is in 'Serious Jeopardy' of Losing Mayoral Race, Poll Suggests
United Flight Forced to Land After Attempted Hijacking
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Tipsheet

Fact-Based Legislation

Fact-Based Legislation

As the mother of two small children, I am open to any constitutional method that will actually succeed in preventing another Newtown-style massacre.

Not surprisingly, the left is pushing more gun control.  But based on the experiences of Britain and Australia in banning guns, more gun control isn't going to address the problem

Advertisement

It feels good to pass a law -- if we can affix blame on a specific phenomenon (like widespread gun ownership) and then legislate against it, that restores our sense of control over our children's well-being and confidence in our own efficacy.

But it seems like plain common sense that before we go infringing on constitutional rights -- or any rights, for that matter -- there should be clear, demonstrable proof that the law being contemplated actually succeeds in doing what its proponents promise.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos