The Cultural Vanguard Is Now the Cultural Rearguard
Here's That Ex-CIA Spook Who Thought Iran Could Sink Our Aircraft Carriers
Watch a Caller Take Chris Cuomo to the Cleaners Regarding Left-Wing Violence
Why This GOP Rep Tore Into Trump's Former Intel Official Who Resigned Over...
A Lot of People Are Whipping Out the Receipts Shredding the Reason Why...
Watch a Liberal Fox Host Get Roundly Mocked Over Her Rant About the...
Lawmaker Introduces Measure to Restrict Military Artificial Intelligence Tech
Minneapolis Auto Thefts Surge 35 Percent Under Tim Walz, Jacob Frey
'This Is an Issue of Public Safety.' Las Vegas Sheriff Defies Judge's Order...
Millionaire Developer Murdered by 'Trans Woman' in Los Angeles
Israel Just Eliminated Iran’s Intelligence Minister Esmaeil Khatib
The Things We Take for Granted
Freedom Is Not Free
Progress on Returning Refugees
There’s No Sheriff in Town: Can Congress Fix Health Care?
Tipsheet

A Few Thoughts on the Skewed Polls

A Few Thoughts on the Skewed Polls

Over the past few days, there has been plenty of chatter about how accurate the polls are.  Hugh Hewitt, among others, has established that some pretty dubious assumptions underlie many of the polls that are regularly touted in the MSM as decisive evidence of a pending Obama victory.

Advertisement

Taken together, the polls purporting to predict a fairly easy Obama victory have the purported effect of enspiriting Obama supporters, and depressing Romney supporters -- presumably leading to heightened turnout among the former, reduced turnout among the latter.  But as the MSM celebrates the supposed Obama leads with an air of "this thing is over," there are two things to keep in mind:

(1) Look at what Obama does, not what the MSM polls say. So Obama has a particular state -- say, Ohio -- locked up with a ten-point lead?  If so, why's he spending so much time and money there? Wouldn't he be doing what he did in 2008, when it became apparent that he would win, i.e., moving his money and attention to more traditionally Republican states in an effort to win a sweeping, Reagan-style reelection and claim a mandate?

(2) Keep in mind the nature of Obama's base. Some of his biggest supporters include young people and minorities, whose participation in 2008 was unprecedented.  When you read the polls assuming that Democrat participation will be even greater than in 2008, also consider this piece, run yesterday by AP ("Election 'Mania' Missing on College Campuses").  What about this AP story: "African-American Christians Waver Over Vote"?

Advertisement

We hear, day and night, so many tales of doom about the Romney campaign, some so ridiculously overhyped that many in the punditocracy took an obvious parody at face value yesterday.  We hear less about potential problems within the Democrat camp, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

And it would be a delicious irony if all the MSM hyping of skewed pro-Obama polls ultimately convinced his wavering supporters that the President doesn't "need" their vote, thereby relieving them of any perceived obligation to vote.

The point here isn't to tell anyone that Romney has this election in the bag.  The point is to remind everyone that, given the media's overt sympathies (can you believe the morning shows didn't even report on the new reports of the administration's fatal incompetence in Benghazi?!), we're not getting the real story about how the campaign is going.  So work hard, and pray even harder.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos