Could it be possible that today marks the beginning of his reelection prospects going the same way?
Let's hope Crossroads or any other number of people get some ads up pointing out the following:
1. Obama ran against Hillary Clinton saying that he would not support an individual mandate.
2. After he won, he said he would support an individual mandate -- but it wasn't a tax.
3. In the Supreme Court, to make his legislation constitutional, he instructed his Solicitor General to argue that it was a tax, after all -- thereby violating his pledge against a middle class tax increase.
Are you even kidding me?