Here's the Latest Plot to Get Biden to Drop Out
Biden Went to Michigan, And Humiliation Awaited Him
Marx and the Democrats
Time for Trump to Leverage the Republican Convention!
A Never-Trumper Changes Her Tune
Iran's Puppet President
Biden Is Blowing Up Affordable Drug Pricing
Forget Who Is President Next Year, Who Is President Now?
The Founders Supported Intellectual Property Rights. We Should, Too.
Joe Biden Isn’t Stepping Down
First They Came for the Socialists
The Biden White House Is Living In an 'Alternate Universe'
Here are the Four Republicans Who Saved Merrick Garland From Inherent Contempt Resolution
Judge Tosses Out Alec Baldwin Case In Shocking Turn of Events
Wisconsin Law May Force Biden to Stay on the Ballot

Elizabeth Warren & Harvard Law School

Jonathan Capehart argues that Elizabeth Warren's "complicated" "mix" of ethnic heritages/cultural identities "shouldn't be a liability, and I wish she'd stop acting like it is."  
Interesting, but it totally misses the point. Her "complicated" "mix" is only a "liability" now because she sought to deploy her Native American heritage selectively to her benefit.  

In fact, Harvard Law School was actively (almost monomaniacally) on the hunt for a more "diverse" faculty during the early- to mid-nineties. It was part of the aftershock of the Derrick Bell resignation and controversy over law school hiring practices -- diversity was a big, big, major deal. Designating oneself a Native American was almost surely a significant point in one's favor at Harvard Law School in the mid-nineties -- even more than ever before or after -- if the goal was to obtain a coveted tenured professorship there. 

So when it turns out that Professor Warren has claimed a significant competitive benefit -- and then can't even readily document the source of that claim -- there's sure to be a controversy.  That's especially true if, as her spokesman claims, she's "proud" of her heritage: Why, then, did she drop all references to it after gaining her Harvard post?

Finally, the very concept of looking at race or ethnic heritage to advantage some (at the expense of others) in higher education is already controversial.  To the extent that many people can justify it at all, in their own minds it's a potential remedy (or at least some kind of compensation) for the injustices readily identifiable members of certain minority groups may confront in certain situations.  It's clear that Professor Warren -- blond, blue-eyed -- never confronted any disadvantages because of her Native American heritage . . . so perhaps Massachusetts voters are wondering why she should have felt herself entitled to claim special benefits arising from it.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos