Here's What Happened When an Arab-Israeli Activist Attended a Pro-Hamas Rally in NYC
The Kennedy Family Is Pretty Damn Gross and Still Joe Biden Is Worse
We Were Warned
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 214: What the Bible Says About Passover and...
What Can Be Made Fun of and What Can't
The Anti-Israel Protests at Columbia Just Got Worse
Schumer Getting Rid of Mayorkas Impeachment Could Affect Democrats in November and Beyond
Justin Trudeau Announces 'Halal Mortgages' for Muslims
Democrats Promise to Keep Mike Johnson’s Job Alive After Ukraine Aid Package Passed
Trump Attorney Calls for Judge Overseeing Hush Money Trial to be Dismissed
Media Outlets Purposely Leave Out Key Detail About Would-Be School Shooter
Prepare to Shell Out Massive Amounts of Money for Taxes If Biden Is...
Democrat Makes Bizarre Comment on the Russia-Ukraine Border After Massive Aid Package Pass...
Well Of Course They Hate America
Netflix Movie Boosts Program Helping Disabled Veterans

An Example of the Problem

It is no surprise that Eva Longoria is challenging Newt Gingrich over remarks he made about poor children; she is, after all, a big Obama supporter.

What IS surprising is that the "New Newt" -- if there is, indeed, such a thing -- would provide her with such a ripe, easily exploited target.  Why in the world would he make such remarks, which were bound to be misunderstood, misinterpreted and highly polarizing?  As background, he said the following:

"Really poor children, in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around the who works so they have no habit of showing up on Monday.  They have no habit of staying all day, they  have no habit of 'I do this and you give me cash' unless it is illegal."

Look, there's no doubt that culture -- ie, the life choices one makes -- play a vital role in life outcomes.  It's been documented that one's chances of falling into (or remaining in) poverty are significantly reduced by following three "golden rules": (1) graduating from high school; (2) getting married and staying  married; and (3) not having children until one is married.

But challenging the work habits "poor children" in the way Gingrich chose to do it is, understandably, offensive to many people -- not all of them poor (many, indeed, are likely to be the suburban independent female voters either presidential candidate will need to win).  Whatever the truths of his statements, the way he chose to deliver them creates unnecessary controversy and allows Democrats to play into a stereotype of Republicans as heartless and insensitive to the plight of those less fortunate -- a political loser in an economy where many otherwise self-sufficient people are struggling.

What's more, it distracts attention from where voters need to be focusing -- on the dismal economy and President Obama's responsibility for it.

In short, it is another example of Gingrich's verbal indiscipline (reminiscent of the orphanage and the Susan Smith debacles from the 90's) becoming a secret weapon -- for the Democrats.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos