Is This Really the Woman Who Can Help Harris With Her Blue Wall...
Kamala Is in Serious Trouble in Michigan
And Now The Atlantic Might Become Engulfed in a Journalistic Scandal for This...
I'm Shocked This MSNBC Host Didn't Self-Combust After Hearing What Philly Voters Had...
Kamala Again Got Asked This Question About Biden's Mental Health. She Did Another...
Unleash the Power of Persuasion
Play Time/Jail Time
Court Rules NY Can't Deny Second Amendment Rights to Poor People
'Release the Memes': Babylon Bee Scores Free Speech Win After Newsom Tried to...
Trump-Vance Campaign Files FEC Complaint Over Labour Staffers Coming to US to Campaign...
Is This a Sign the Left Is Having Buyer's Remorse Over Harris?
A Democrat Running in a Swing District Claimed to Support Border Security. Her...
Jennings Calls Out Cheney for One of Her Worst Comments While Campaigning With...
Fact Check: No, but Seriously, Did Kamala Harris Really Ever Work at a...
AOC Has a Meltdown About Trump Working at McDonald's
Tipsheet

A HUGE Breach of Trust

The willingness of some of the GOP's "supercommittee" members to consider tax increases is an incredible breach of trust.

It spells disaster for the Republican "brand" -- if those who repeatedly pledged not to raise taxes now do so in an ugly "Read My Lips" redux, why should any of us ever believe any Republican politician again?  If GOP leaders want to go into the semi-permanent political wilderness, they should follow this foolhardy course: It all but guarantees the emergence of a third party that will split the GOP-conservative coalition and boost the Democrats. 
Advertisement

What's more, it's terrible policy.  With a struggling economy, everyone knows that the worst thing to do is to increase the economic burden on those most likely to create jobs.  Want long-term unemployment and even less economic activity?  By all means, make higher income people give more to the government so that they have less to spend on the kind of activities that create private-sector jobs.

If the GOP is smart, it will reject tax increases in every form.  Instead, it will promote and pass legislation to prevent the defense cuts from happening -- and ensure that the threat of massive defense cuts becomes the responsibility of the President and Democrats.  Note that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned against such drastic defense cuts, so legislation ensuring that they don't occur would actually bipartisan.  Forcing a House vote on such legislation would have the effect of splitting the Democratic party -- rather than allowing a "supercommittee" tax increase vote that would split Republicans.
Advertisement

Recall also that none of the threatened defense cuts would go into place until 2013 -- that's largely after the inauguration of a Republican president IF the GOP doesn't, once again, shoot itself in the foot by reneging on a "no taxes" pledge.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement