Karoline Leavitt Wrecked This Lefty Reporter for His Awful Take on the Minneapolis...
Some Are Saying Nick Shirley's Latest Video on Somali Fraud Is Worse Than...
Another Shooting by ICE Has the Press Desperately Looking for Ways to Reframe...
Wisconsin Cannot Afford to Follow Minnesota
HHS Secretary Kennedy Announces Healthcare Price Transparency
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche Just Promised to Stop the 'Terrorism' of MN...
Experts Weigh in on SCOTUS Cases Involving Boys in Girls' Sports
Is Socialism a Form of Moderation Amongst Democrats? A WaPo Columnist Thinks So
Tim Walz Walz Begs the White House to 'Turn Down the Temperature' After...
TX Congressional Candidate Claims to Be a Trump Ally, but His Record Shows...
Cea Weaver Describes Rent-Control As a Way to Cripple the Real Estate Market
Illinois Businessman Sentenced to Six Years for $55 Million Loan and PPP Fraud...
Tim Walz Calls ICE an ‘Occupation’ as Minneapolis Descends into Chaos
North Carolina Woman Sentenced to 6 Years in $12M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Texas Doctor, Assistant Get Prison Time for $3M Healthcare Fraud Targeting Elderly
Tipsheet

Questions for Tax-Loving Democrats

Democrats are gearing up for tax hike votes throughout the weekend.  The Baucus plan would raise taxes on those making more than $250,000 while the Schumer plan would raise taxes on those making in excess of $1,000,000.
Advertisement
 The idea, of course, is to try to portray the Republicans as the "party of the rich."

But here are some questions for the Democrats who are so hot on tax increases:

(1) What is the purpose of taxation?  Is it to fund necessary government expenditures, or is it to "spread the wealth around" (as the President so memorably put it during the 2008 campaign)?

(2) If it's simply to fund necessary government expenditures, why not raise taxes on everyone?  It would raise more revenue, right?

(3) Even if the purpose of taxation is to "spread the wealth around" -- social leveling -- what makes Democrats think government can spend money more efficiently than either private charities, or private consumers who would use the money left to them to buy products or create jobs?  In other words, why is it better to pay more taxes so that government can supply more unemployment benefits, rather than letting businessmen and consumers keep their own money and use it to create jobs (or consume goods and services) so that unemployment benefits become less necessary and costly?
Advertisement

(4) Since everyone's talking about "fairness" -- how "fair" is it that a bunch of liberal politicians (many of them elected by voters with minimal tax obligations) can insist that other people pay higher taxes . . . taxes that will never impact them at all?  

(5) And finally, down the road, can any government survive when the number of those who pay little or no taxes increases to the point where they can just continually vote for higher taxes on a shrinking group of "the rich"?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos