Did You Catch What the Latest Polls Also Revealed About the Trump Agenda?
I Wish This Headline in The New York Times Was Satire, But It's...
Not Many Americans Are Going to Tolerate What These Federal Workers Had to...
Even This Liberal Reporter Was Aghast at CBS News' Margaret Brennan's Appalling Take...
So, JD Vance Made a German Politician Cry. Here's What Happened.
Former Students of Christian College Threaten to Withhold Donations for Bowing to Leftist...
Tom Homan Shoots Down Questions About Quid Pro Quo With Eric Adams
A Top Hamas Terrorist Was Plotting to Kill Jews in Europe. Here's What...
Utah Bill Would Do More to Reduce Unintentional Shootings Than Any Gun Control...
Jack Smith Discloses Eyebrow-Raising Gift
One Government Agency Is Scrambling to Rehire Hundreds of Fired Employees
Kamala Harris Is Still Giving Cringeworthy Remarks
You Won’t Believe Why This Border Agent Was Just Arrested
Kaitlan Collins Had Quite the Response After Deleting Link to Luigi Mangione's Defense...
Border Agents Will Stop Wearing Body Cameras. Here’s Why.
Tipsheet

Christine O'Donnell's Victory

Normally, I would be thrilled at a small government conservative fortysomething woman winning the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate.  I support lots of theTea Party principles.
Advertisement


All that being said, although nominating Christine O'Donnell to be their standard bearer was well within the rights of Delaware Republicans, I suspect it won't turn out to have been the Tea Party's finest hour -- or Sarah Palin's.

Oh, sure, O'Donnell's going to have a hard time pulling in enough independents to win in a state as liberal as Delaware -- and that will be a shame if it turns out that Republicans win nine of the ten seats they need to take control of the Senate.  It makes a big difference which party controls the Senate committee chairmanships, from Judiciary to Appropriations to Finance to Foreign Relations.  But again, if Delaware Republicans decide instead to take a chance on a rock-ribbed conservative Republican rather than a moderate one, that's their decision . . . and one that Republicans elsewhere can and should respect, even if they disagree with it on purely pragmatic grounds (which is where I come down).

No, my big problem with O'Donnell is the discomfitingly long list of issues of personal rectitude that have arisen during the course of the campaign.  Oh, you know -- the gender discrimination suit against ISI, the allegations in which presupposed that O'Donnell had obtained her bachelor's degree, when in fact she had not.  And the outright falsehoods her campaign told about her opponent -- a technique that the MSM simply won't tolerate against a Democrat.  The
Advertisement
allegations of financial mismanagement and the fact she still owes money to her 2008 campaign.  Taken all together, it sounds to me like Ms. O'Donnell is a little bit of a nut.

I hope I'm wrong.  I'd love to be able to apologize to Ms. O'Donnell for having misunderstood all these issues.  But I fear that's not likely.

And in the end, if all this is true, Tea Partiers and Republicans generally are going to be put in the position either of repudiating someone whose stated political views are largely ones we share -- or else descending to the depths of hypocrisy by endorsing a profoundly flawed candidate that we would lambast if she were a liberal  (and rightly so).

Ultimately, it's a shame to lose the Delaware Senate seat, if that's what happens.  But it's acceptable to do so represented by a worthy candidate whose views are simply too conservative for the state she's running in.  It's untenable to do so because Republicans and Tea Partiers somehow nominated someone whose behavior and record do not match the decency and forthrightness of their own.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement