This Thread of Libs Melting Down Over The Washington Post Not Endorsing Kamala...
Here's What a Shark Tank Host Said About Kamala That Caused a Total...
Now We’ll Never Know Who The Washington Post Supports
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 239: What the Bible Says About Truth –...
The Great Gaslight About the Great Replacement
Trump Takes an Axe to Tax
Exxon Knew! First Warming and Climate, Now Plastics
Turn Off the Politicians and Listen to Yourself
Alive and Ambulatory? Let’s Be Thankful for These Blessings.
Dangerous Words
America’s Greatness Is found in 'One Nation, Under God'
20 Reasons to Vote for Republicans-- and Especially for Donald Trump
Kamala, Jesus, and the Founders
Here’s the Highlights of Joe Rogan’s Three-Hour Interview With Trump
Israel Offers Grim Warning to Iran After Launching Strikes
Tipsheet

It Really COULD Be the Decisive Vote

Contrary to earlier reports in the Boston Herald, Barney Frank and the the Massachusetts machine insist that if Scott Brown wins the US Senate seat, his swearing-in won't be delayed in order to facilitate the passage of the heinously unpopular Democratic health care bill
Advertisement
.

Well, that's good to know.  So a vote for Brown could be construed as a vote against a government takeover of health care -- nothing more and nothing less.

At this point, it's important for Brown's campaign to reach out to Massachusetts' independents, letting them know that they understand that a vote for him doesn't have to mean that they're "becoming" Republicans.  Rather, it's simply a way for people to tell the arrogant DC Democrats that Americans expect their health care bill to be created, amended and passed in a sensible, bipartisan manner -- without special deals and backroom "fixes."  Or breaking the bank.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement