There's Another Embarrassing Update on Biden's Aid for Terrorists Pier
Bill Maher Pinpoints the One Issue That's Going to Get Dems 'F**ked on...
MSNBC's Morning Joe Segment About Biden's Strong G7 Summit Gets Demolished by European...
Apparently, New York Magazine Thinks All Black People Look Alike
The Biden Admin Is Still Withholding a Mandated Report on Iranian Sanctions
$895-Billion House Defense Bill Signals End of Biden Administration Woke Daycare for Milit...
State Department's Top Hostage Negotiator Reacts to Indictment of WSJ Journalist
CNN Bullies Ticketmaster Into Canceling Tucker Carlson Tour
Senate Republicans Block Bill Protecting IVF
Nearly Half of Americans Have Little Faith Biden Will Make It Through First...
Democrat's Law Directly Linked to Increase In Fentanyl Deaths
How This Republican Is Protecting the Integrity of the 2024 Election
CNN Releases New Rules for Trump, Biden Debate
Biden Importing Venezuelan Gangs Into U.S.
Will Trump Be the First Republican to Win This Vote Since 1988?
Tipsheet

Waterboarding Worked

It's all there in the Washington Post -- US officials gained valuable information that saved innocent American lives because Khalid Sheik Mohammed was waterboarded, deprived of sleep, and forced to wear a diaper (after other methods for getting him to talk failed).
Advertisement


The detail and array of facts assembled in the piece -- and the indisputable conclusion -- suggest two things: 

First, at least some in the press (and the CIA) have decided that the Holder inquiry, investigating and possibly prosecuting CIA agents who obtained such information, is a bridge too far.  The piece is a preemptive defense.

Second, it leaves the opponents of enhanced interrogation techniques with only one last argument: That the same information could have been obtained with less coercive measures.  And even that attack loses its luster; given KSM's history and earlier refusals to talk, that hardly seems likely.    What's more, are we really willing to risk the lives of innocent Americans to test the proposition?

Let's be clear: At a certain point, there will be terrorists from whom we can extract lifesaving information only through the use of enhanced interrogation techniques.  The question for the Obama administration is this: Is having the ability to claim the moral "high ground" (telling "the world" that the US doesn't use the techniques) worth the loss of innocent American lives?

Not in my book.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement