This Thread of Libs Melting Down Over The Washington Post Not Endorsing Kamala...
Here's What a Shark Tank Host Said About Kamala That Caused a Total...
Now We’ll Never Know Who The Washington Post Supports
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 239: What the Bible Says About Truth –...
The Great Gaslight About the Great Replacement
Trump Takes an Axe to Tax
Exxon Knew! First Warming and Climate, Now Plastics
Turn Off the Politicians and Listen to Yourself
Alive and Ambulatory? Let’s Be Thankful for These Blessings.
Dangerous Words
America’s Greatness Is found in 'One Nation, Under God'
20 Reasons to Vote for Republicans-- and Especially for Donald Trump
Kamala, Jesus, and the Founders
Here’s the Highlights of Joe Rogan’s Three-Hour Interview With Trump
Israel Offers Grim Warning to Iran After Launching Strikes
Tipsheet

The Testing of the President Continues

In the wake of the North  Korean missile launch, President Obama has no doubt terrified Kim Jung Il by declaring the act to be "provocative" and calling on him to abide by "international obligations."
Advertisement
  That's typical of the left-Democrat response; do nothing but talk, and hope against hope that people who have shown themselves to be indifferent both to international opinion and human suffering for some reason act differently now than they have in the past.

In contrast, Newt Gingrich reflects a conservative-Republican response.  Note that the United States has the capacity to have disabled the missile; Gingrich says he would have done so.  Such action would have sent a clear message that North Korea's efforts to launch such a missile will not be tolerated.  Period.  It would have captured Kim Jung Il's attention and drawn a firm line in the sand.  Instead, Kim now has no meaningful incentive not to take the next step.

Which approach do you think makes us safer?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement