It's Not the Iowa Poll That Has Frank Luntz Gobsmacked
Bill Maher Had to Call Out This 'Zombie Lie' When Interviewing a Black...
System Designed to Defend Against Cyberattacks Blamed for 911 Outage
Don't Expect to Hear From the White House Much Over the Next Week
New Research Paper Shows Which States Affected by Pollutants From East Palestine Train...
Hewitt Identifies the One Crucial Aspect About Trump Those on His VP Short...
Here's Which State Just Became the First in the Nation to Require 10...
Dr. Scott Atlas Gives It Right Back After Potshot From Fauci
The Story About the Illegal Alien Who Allegedly Raped a 13-Year-Old in NYC...
New Poll: Trump Is Still Up in Key Swing States
DOJ Omits One Inconvenient Detail About the Club Q Shooter
Here’s How This California School District Trains Staff About Illegal Immigration
Biden's DOJ Went After a Doctor for Exposing Trans 'Care' for Children. Here's...
There Will Be a Price to Pay: Consequences Are Coming for Universities That...
The Transcript Is Here for Biden's Amnesty Announcement, and It Doesn't Help the...

Why Don't You "Spread the Wealth Around"?

Apparently, the Obama campaign remains so flush with cash that it's going to give staffers an extra month's pay, along with blackberries, laptops and other assorted goodies

Assuming the money was raised within the boundaries of law and ethics (a mighty big assumption), in one sense, who can object?  If it's theirs fair and square, then they should be able to use it for any purpose they please.

But  given that Obama's victory supposedly represents a "wave" of "change" that involves "spreading the wealth around," it's the height of hypocrisy to blow all that extra cash on goodies for themselves (the political equivalent of the "ultra-rich").  Surely McCain campaign staffers (not to mention "ordinary Americans") would like laptops, blackberries and a little extra cash as much as Obama staffers would -- and what's more, they don't have the expectation of plum government jobs in the new year. 

If Obama's team feels entitled to mandate that hard-working, well-to-do Americans to pay a bigger share of what they have, shouldn't its members be setting the example of the "sacrifice" they intend to demand of others?  Or, for them, is it "sacrifice" for thee, but not so much for me?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos