ICE Won't Honor Detainer on Illegal Alien Rapist in FL, So He's Walking...
Biden Arrests a Journalist
America Desperately Needs Reagan
Government Intrusion Where it Does not Belong
A New York Times Propaganda Anniversary That Will Live in Infamy
Chicago Public Schools Will Be Even More Dangerous Without School Resource Officers
The Latest Despicable Anti-Israel Lie
Time To Take On The Satanic Temple
Illegal Guatemalan Migrants Convicted of Sexual Assault On Children Arrested In the US
Friends With Benefits: Why This Company Is Exempt From Gavin Newsom's $20 Minimum...
Arizona Federal Judge Rules Voters Must Prove Their U.S. Citizenship Status In Order...
Transcript of Hunter Biden Testimony Makes Eric Swalwell Look Like Even More of...
Footage Reveals the Third Pipe Bomb Camera Was Turned Away on J6
University of Florida Fires All DEI Staff
Cruz Introduces Legislation to Help With Another Border Crisis Consequence: Rise of 'Flyer...

The Damage That Media Bias Wreaks

The Wall Street Journal's ironically-titled "Political Wisdom" provides a stellar example of how media bias actually works.  "Given that it now appears Gov. Sarah Palin will finish the campaign without ever holding a press conference or making an appearance on the Sunday interview shows," the blurb asks,
"is it worth covering Palin at all ?"

It cites to a Christopher Hitchens column.  Well, maybe Hitchens didn't know when he wrote the original piece, but surely "Political Wisdom" would have been aware before citing it that, as CBS reported yesterday, Sarah Palin has been more accessible to the press than any of the three men on the tickets

That's exhibit 1, and it is the kind of "journalism" that gives credence to charges of media bias.  It builds on the conventional wisdom among the chattering classes, and spreads it in defiance of facts.  People don't get the truth because, too often, those who are supposed to be reporting it are trapped in a web of their own assumptions.

The second example of that phenomenon pertains to this post yesterday -- where I listed the examples of all the polls supposedly pointing to a nearly-inevitable Kerry victory at about this time four years ago.  It seems that the press routinely predicts Dem victories -- could it be because everyone
they know wouldn't dream of voting for anyone but a Democrat, and so they tend to over-generalize those sentiments to extend to the rest of the country?

Whatever the reason, it's dangerous and regrettable.  It raises the hopes of the left and Democrats to a pitch somewhere near certainty that they will win.  Then, if they don't pull it out, they're left feeling bitter and cheated, because they had been so sure they would triumph (thanks to the overly optimistic reportage).  And it poisons the well -- and the country -- for those who do win in defiance of press predictions.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos