We Had Another Nancy Mace Crash Out After Getting Obliterated in SC Primary
Standoff: Active Shooter in Texas Leaves One Dead, 11 Wounded; UPDATE: Suspect Dead
Elon Musk Just Became the World's First Trillionaire and the Socialists Are Already...
Vice President JD Vance Blasts 'Leaked' Iran Deal, Says Final Agreement Will Lead...
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to Officially File to Void President Trump's First Impeachment
Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard Says American Taxpayers Funded Over 120 Biolabs Across the...
Your 'America First' Congresswoman Is Now Doing Propaganda For Russia
Steve Hilton Reveals Who's Really Responsible for the Thousands of Missing Migrant Childre...
Elon Musk Reflects on SpaceX’s Wild Rise As His Company Goes Public
President Trump Just Blew a Hole in Iran's Alleged Leaked Deal
John Cornyn Renews His Attention-Seeking Temper Tantrum
EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Alien Charged With Child Sexual Abuse Faces ICE Detainer
Dan Sullivan and GOP Officials Just Ended Democrats' Nefarious Plan in Alaska
Trump Reshares Comments From Top Iranian Official. Here's What He Said.
Trump Floats Total DC Takeover If This Happens Next Week
Tipsheet

Why "Experience" Matters

Why "Experience" Matters
Sarah Palin has been a game changer.  But what her selection as the GOP veep nominee has already shown is the benefit of experience and flexibility in presidential politics.
Advertisement


Not, of course, the kind of "experience" that the Obama campaign was ready to deride as "more of the same."  Some GOP party insiders were mildly taken aback by the Palin pick, given that it would deprive John McCain of the supposed "experience" edge over a first term senator who's spent a grand total of around 143 days actually doing his job.  But they were wrong.

What McCain was smart and tough enough to see is that the "experience" issue isn't moving voters -- the fact that Hillary Clinton's campaign failed to recognize until it was too late.  It's being trumped by a desire for change and to see Washington shaken up.  If voters can get that plus having a president who actually knows what he's doing, so much the better.

A less flexible, less intelligent guy than McCain would have continued to barrel down the "experience" track, wondering why on earth his argument wasn't getting traction.  But in campaigns, you can't change what people care about -- you can only change their perception of who's more likely to deliver what they care about.  So McCain went with the flow and picked Palin over, for example, Romney.

The question now is, what's Barack Obama going to do about it?  He keeps on repeating the Democratic equivalent of a McCain "experience" mantra.  But the fact is that people aren't buying the argument that McCain is "more of the same."  Barack's success banks on whether he gets that, and if he does, what else he's got in his arsenal.
Advertisement


Sure, he can try to "out-change" McCain.  But the problem is that the changes Barack's wanting to bring -- higher taxes, government controlled health care, a weaker stance internationally -- aren't likely to have mass appeal.  They can only roll in on a wave of discontent with the status quo (which is why, in part, the Dems are so invested in trying to portray McCain-Palin as status quo).

John McCain has enough experience and psychological toughness not to let an opponent get inside his head -- and to know when and how he's got to change the game.  It still remains to be seen whether that's an experience gap that Barack Obama is capable of closing.  And right now, that's the only kind of experience that matters.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement