A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

Sleaze Alert

At this hour, the Drudge Report has an item (no link) that reads as follows: "NYT PREPARES TO FRONT EXPOSE ON PALIN'S BABY... DEVELOPING..."
 
Who knows?  It could be a false lead.  Or . .  .
Advertisement


Is it even conceivable (no pun intended) that the "newspaper of record" would try to run an "expose" on a baby in order to harm his mother for political reasons?  Are they going to try to blame the Governor in some way for little Trig's Down syndrome?  What can there possibly be to "expose"?

The possibilities boggle the mind, and sadly, after what we've seen last week, there's not really much I'm prepared to rule out.  It would seem to me, however, that the Times is running the risk of creating the backlash of all time, in what seems like a transparent effort to offer aid and comfort to the Obama/Biden ticket.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement