Bill Maher's Gutfeld Appearance Highlighted a Point That's Viewed As Treasonous by the...
The Trump Hush Money Trial Imploded Yesterday
KC Star's Idea of 'Poetic Justice' for Harrison Butker Is What You'd Expect...
Wait, the U.S. Senate Chaplain Said What About the Death of the Iranian...
Joe Biden's Executive Privilege Plot Is a Nixonian Throwback
New Tool Keeps Families Up-to-Date on the Left's War on Parents
The ‘Trump Never Conceded’ Lie
Silver Lining in Jen Psaki's Lie: Gold Star Family Gets Red Carpet Rollout...
‘Biden Ain’t Black!’ Why Minorities Are Dumping Democrats and Embracing Trump
Two Contrasting Congressional Days
Here's What's 'Especially Remarkable' About Trump's April Fundraising Numbers
What Will Change in Iran After Raisi's Death? One Ex-CIA Official Weighs in.
Is It Any Surprise Oakland Took This Step in Response to Copper Thieves?
'Like a Bomb:' CNN Analyst Again Shocked by Michael Cohen's Latest Courtroom Meltdown
The B(D)S Movement

Barack & Abortion: Naive, or Worse?

Barack Obama's health care plan moves America toward socialized medicine, with the attendant burdens and bureaucracies.

How interesting it is, then, to learn that there's a piece of red tape that Barack historically opposed.  But how disappointing that it's at the expense of a possibly living baby.

Debating the Born Alive Infant Protection Act on April 4, 2002 (transcript here), on pages 32-33, Barack seems primarily concerned with the inconvenience to the abortionist of having to call in another doctor to make sure that a baby who was supposed to be dead as a result of the abortion wasn't able to be saved.  (HT: Erick Erickson at RedState).

In Barack's view, it's apparently inconceivable (no pun intended) that a doctor who is willing to perform an abortion wouldn't do anything in his power to save a baby that was alive as a result of his own mistake.  In Barack's words, "if there are children who are being born alive, I, at least, have confidence that a doctor who is in that room is going to be sure that they are being looked after" (transcript, pp. 33-34).

Hm.  Naive, or worse?  As a lawyer, surely Barack knew that Illinois law permits claims for "wrongful life"
 (see footnote 10 in link) -- in other words, a doctor who botched an abortion (by failing to end the baby's life) could be liable in a lawsuit. 

It's no surprise that Illinois would permit such a claim -- in many ways, it's a plaintiff lawyer's paradise.  But it strikes me that it would be one more reason that a second opinion would make sense -- it's not a great idea to leave all determinations about a baby's viability in the hands of the doctor who was supposed to have executed the abortion.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos