Here's the Part of the WSJ Piece on the Death of Biden's Presidency...
Radio Host Got Brutally Honest on Why Black Voters Never Really Liked Kamala...
CNN's Harry Enten Breaks Down the Biden-Harris Switcheroo
Democrat Lies And Incompetence Make Conspiracy Theories Great Again
'Party of Hypocrites': Black Lives Matter Is Mad at the DNC for Its...
Musk Responds to Report Claiming He's Donating Huge Monthly Sum to Pro-Trump Super...
Tlaib Wants Netanyahu Turned Over to ICC During His US Trip
After Assassination Attempt, One Feature About Trump's Rallies May Change
After Writing Viral Op-ed Calling on Biden to Step Aside, George Clooney Issues...
You Knew Democrats Were Going to Roll Out This Narrative Once Biden Exited...
Democrats Learned the Wrong Lesson From the Attempted Assassination of President Trump
Here's Why Nikki Haley Sent a Cease and Desist Letter to a Kamala...
Chuck Schumer Finally Endorsed Kamala Harris and What a Mess It Was
Roll Tape: Radical Leftist Kamala Harris, in Her Own Words
California Kamala: a Calamity for Our Country
Tipsheet

Reading the Tea Leaves

Hillary Clinton's communications director, Howard Wolfson, has said that believes that John Edwards' presence in the race cost Hillary the nomination.  If Edwards hadn't been in the race, Hillary would have won Iowa, he insists, and rolled on to secure the nomination.
Advertisement


This is revealing, for two reasons.

First, keep in mind that Wolfson is one of Hillary's top guys.  He's a loyal-soldier type, not known for going off the reservation.  As her communications director -- someone who talks to the press for a living -- he spoke on the record, and he certainly understands exactly the impact his statement is going to have.   It's going to exacerbate tensions between Obama and Clinton supporters. 

The subtext of all of this comes down to the fact that, no matter how many times she publicly exhorts her supporters to vote for Barack, the Clintons clearly hope he isn't going to win -- and are more than willing to do what they can to defeat him, as long as it can't be traced directly back to them.  Having her spokesman fan the flames gives the statement authenticity, along with sufficient deniability.  Perfect.

Second, there's a pretty interesting assumption in Wolfson's charge -- one that's profoundly insulting to Edwards supporters.  He presumes that all the voters who voted for Edwards would have voted for Hillary had Edwards not been there.  But you can only make that assumption if you believe that Edwards voters were people who obviously didn't want Hillary (and maybe were looking for "change"), but who wouldn't support the other "change agent," Barack Obama, no matter what.  Hm.  Why could that be? Race, perhaps?  (Why, with so many Dems, does it
Advertisement
always come down to race?!)

As the linked piece delicately puts it, "Wolfson's contention is not shared by the Obama campaign, whose officials never bought the argument that Clinton was the second choice of Edwards voters."  I bet.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement