Guess Who Could Be Coming Back If Kamala Wins?
Man Arrested for Threatening to Assassinate Supreme Court Justices
MSNBC Confirms Kamala Is Lying from the Center, and CNN Drowns in Interview...
FCC Commissioner Slams Biden-Harris for Focusing on Climate Change, DEI, and Not Underserv...
Is There a Mole Within the Secret Service?
Why These People Were Rushed to the Hospital Following a Trump Rally
Trump Surprises Young Boy With Rare Brain Disorder With Special Present
Did We Just See the Worst Vote Against Israel From the UN?
Drug Companies Caused the Problems With 340B
One GOP Lawmaker Says It Doesn't Feel 'Safe' to Work in Politics
We Have Post-Debate Polling News Out of a Key Battleground State
Number of Interviews the Trump-Vance Ticket Has Given in Contrast to the Harris-Walz...
Democrats Are Still Running With This Narrative About Harris Becoming the Nominee
Intel and the U.S. Lose Their Bet on ESG
A Growing Number of Americans Are Getting Their News From TikTok
Tipsheet

It's the Contempt Factor

LA Times columnist Megan Daum wonders why Americans wouldn't want an "intellectual" to be their president

She's missing the point, of course.  To the extent that a president is intelligent and well-educated, that's all to the good.  Voters aren't concerned that someone is "too smart" or "too nuanced." Rather, they worry (with good reason, judging from some of Barack's recent remarks) that with the "intellect" comes a lack of practical horse sense and life experience or, worse yet, a certain elitist contempt for them and their values (George Will lays it out brilliantly
Advertisement
here).

One final comment: How is it that so many in the press or entertainment world have no objection to electing a president "who is embarrassingly superior to me" (as Daum quotes Jon Stewart) when it's a lefty like Barack, but when it's Republican Mitt Romney, the cry goes up that he's just "too perfect"?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement