A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

A Regrettable Necessity

Junior high school students in Mesa, Arizona are protesting a school policy banning hugs that last longer than 2 seconds.

On its face, the policy sounds silly.  But there's a reason for it -- including the fact that close to 1/3 of the school's students were concerned about public displays of affection (PDA) in the school halls.
Advertisement


When I was writing Prude, I learned that in junior high schools all over the country, there are PDA's going on that are clearly inappropriate in an academic setting (and in some cases, inappropriate anywhere, given the tender age of the participants).  The behavior only contributes to a highly-sexualized atmosphere -- one in which boys are actually willing to approach girls they know only casually and graphically solicit sex.

Apparently, parents are "split" over the merits of the 2-second hug policy, and that's part of the problem.  Such a policy is, sadly, necessary in the first place because young people aren't being taught -- no doubt by some of the parents opposing the policy -- about what constitutes acceptable behavior.  As a result, hard-and-fast rules have to be put into place, and everyone's freedom is formally constrained as a result.
Advertisement


In a sense, the whole episode is a perfect example of what happens when informal social sanctions against inappropriate sexual behaviors are eroded. Simply to keep order and enforce some standards of behavior, the "government" (in this case, school authorities) have to get involved and make hard-and-fast laws (in this case, rules) that end up imposing one more layer of top-down control over people's behavior.

The policy is probably necessary -- but that's a shame, isn't it?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement