Well, You Knew Nature Shows Were Going to Venture Into This Subject
Don't Back Down
Biden Slams 'Outrageous' Case Against Israel After Failing to Deter ICC Action
The U.S. Response to Iranian President's Death Is Disgraceful
Two Charts Democrats Don't Want You to See
House Republicans Have a Message for Schumer Regarding His So-Called Border Bill
Fetterman Pushes Back on AOC's Criticism of Him
House Education Committee Releases Update on Its Antisemitism Probe. Harvard Responds.
It's Official: ICC Prosecutor Is Seeking Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Hamas Leader
Trump's Remark During NRA Speech Reignites the Left's Fears That He's a Threat...
Supreme Court Turns Away Challenge on So-Called 'Assault Weapons' Ban
Biden Blasts an 'Extreme' SCOTUS Ruling on Affirmative Action, but There's Just One...
Republican Senators Will Introduce Legislation to Legalize IVF Treatment Nationally
A ‘Trans’ Athlete Won a Girls’ State Title. Here’s How the Crowd Reacted.
Is It Already Too Late for a Biden Comeback?

The Contours of "Judgment"

Barack Obama's all-purpose answer to questions about his foreign policy experience is "judgment."  His campaign asks, as his recent ad put it, "Shouldn't the President be the one -- the only one -- who had judgment and courage to oppose the Iraq war from the start?"  It concludes that, "In a dangerous world, it's judgment that matters."

Well, if that's the case, it seems eminently fair to ask a few questions about the contours of Barack's judgment about the Iraq war.  What's never been clear is whether he opposed the war because -- contrary to the consensus of intelligence services across the world -- he somehow knew that Saddam had no WMD, or whether it was because he believed the war wasn't worth it even if our worst fears about Saddam were true. 

Shouldn't someone in the press be trying to find out?   If he would have opposed the war even if Saddam had had WMD and was willing to give them to other anti-American terrorists (our worst case scenario), that's significant -- and scary.  If his "superior judgment" led him to dismiss the intelligence reports, what will be his criteria as President for evaluating future threats?

Finally, even if one were to concede that his position was correct, is this one judgment really enough of a track record to qualify him to be Commander-in-Chief?  After all, I might be able to predict which contestant is going to win this year's American Idol, but that doesn't make me Quincy Jones-- or even Simon Cowell.  It makes me the happy beneficiary of a lucky guess, validated by many events and decisions over which I had neither knowledge nor control.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos