Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
House Republicans Want to Know Why Ilhan Omar's Income Jumped by 140 Percent...
UN Report Says One of the Deadliest Threats to US National Security Is...
Here's What Trump Had to Say About That Olympic Athlete Who Bashed His...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
'Brass-Knuckled Hypocrisy:' Even the Washington Post Is Slamming Virginia Democrats' Redis...
This Viral Super Bowl Halftime Story About Bad Bunny's Grammy Was Completely False
John Kasich Called Bad Bunny's Show a Celebration of Latino Culture. Did He...
Senator Eric Schmitt Goes Nuclear on Dems Over ICE Funding, Immigration, and the...
Check Out How the Media Portrayed Japan's Conservative Party's Big Election Win
Here Is the Real Reason Bad Bunny Is Anti-American
We Didn't Think Progressives Could Make LA Any Worse, but They Can
Don Lemon Defends Bad Bunny's Halftime Show While Admitting He Had No Idea...
'The President’s Plan Is Working,' Scott Bessent Predicts a Booming Economy in 2026
Tipsheet

Judge Deals Blow to the Nationwide Eviction Moratorium

AP Photo/Gillian Flaccus

Who knew the feds telling property owners they couldn't kick out tenants who didn't pay their rent might be unconstitutional? A federal judge in Texas did, ruling on Thursday that the CDC's eviction moratorium violated the U.S. Constitution. 

Advertisement

"Although the COVID-19 pandemic persists, so does the Constitution," wrote Judge Barker in a 21-page opinion. 

Instituted under President Trump, the moratorium on evictions made it a crime for landlords to evict certain tenants who are unable to pay rent during the pandemic. President Biden and Congress extended the moratorium through March.

At question in the case was whether or not a nationwide eviction moratorium violated the limited powers of the federal government. The judge found that it did, noting the federal government has never claimed such a broad power throughout the nation's history until last year. 

"The absence of an historical analog here calls to mind the Supreme Court’s instruction that '[p]erhaps the most telling indication of [a] severe constitutional problem ... is the lack of historical precedent,'" Judge Barker wrote in his opinion. 

Advertisement

The case did not consider whether the states had the power to regulate residential evictions, something the judge acknowledges has long taken place.

Legal experts expect the case to be appealed to the Texas-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, The Hill reported.  

Placing a moratorium on evictions seems like an unconstitutional "solution" to an unconstitutional problem, that problem being the unprecedented lockdowns.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement