Senators Blast Unprecedented Move to 'Table' Mayorkas Impeachment
While Licking Ice Cream, Biden 'Hopes' for a Ceasefire Benefiting Hamas
Journalist Highlights the Main 'Financial Prize' in the Biden Family Influence Peddling Op...
CBS News' Document Fiasco Over Catherine Herridge's Confidential Files Isn't Over
The DOJ's Indictment of Their Confidential Source Makes the Case for Special Counsel...
Another Member of Biden's Cabinet Is in Trouble With Lawmakers
The Meaningless Virtue Signal in Michigan's Democrat Primary
Following Murder of GA Student, Here's What Trump Is Vowing to Do If...
VA Dems Erupt Over How Lt Governor Referred to Transgender State Senator
Did Ukraine's Top Spy Chief Just Destroy Biden's Narrative About Navalny's Death?
Our DOD Debacle Has Gone on Long Enough
The Majority of Americans Support the Construction of a Border Wall
There's Another Recall Effort Underway for This Democrat Governor
Remember That Criminal Who Shot Three DC Cops Earlier This Month? We Have...
The US Has the Worst Rating Since 1995 on the Latest Index of...

Newsom Signs Bill Removing Automatic Penalty for 'Consensual' Sex Acts Involving Minors

AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

On Friday, Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill into law, passed by the Democrat-controlled state senate and Democrat-controlled state assembly, that reduces penalties for certain adults who engage in sex acts with children as young as 14 years of age. The law makes it more likely that parents won't know when a sex offender has access to their children. 


SB-145 removes the automatic requirement for a person to register as a sex offender when "convicted of nonforcible sodomy with a minor, oral copulation with a minor, or sexual penetration with a minor," so long as the child is at least 14 years of age and the adult is not older than the child by more than 10 years when the sex crime took place, according to Senate Floor Analysis. With the automatic requirement to register as a sex offender removed, only a judge can impose the requirement as part of the sentencing. Judges routinely spark outrage for incredibly lenient sentences involving sex crimes against children.

The bill is being touted as pro-LGBT legislation because it ends what supporters of the legislation are calling long-standing discrimination against the LGBT community. Supporters of the bill say the automatic requirement was discriminatory against gay people because a 24-year-old adult who was convicted of "consensual" oral and anal sex acts with a 15-year-old minor was previously required to register as a sex offender. But if the same-aged adult and minor had engaged in penile-vaginal sex, the offending adult would not be automatically required to register. 


But if protecting children from predators is somehow discriminatory against gay people, what does that say about the LGBT community? 

Rather than impose the automatic requirement on adults who have penile-vaginal sex with minors, the lawmaker who introduced the bill -- state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco -- chose to reduce the penalty on sex offenders instead. The automatic requirement was a safety measure to protect children by mandating sex offenders register on the list, regardless of whatever judge may be overseeing the case. 

SB-145 makes it more likely that parents won't know when a sex offender is living next door. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos