An Anti-ICE Activist Tried Interfering With an Arrest in California. Guess What Happened...
CNN Hosts Peddled a Lie About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting..and DHS Wasn't Gonna...
Zohran Mamdani’s Exploitation of Black Voters Represents Everything I Hate About Democrats
Watch Tim Walz Make a Fool Out of Himself Yet Again
These Democrat States Are Declaring War on ICE
Putin Ally Threatens Nuclear War Against Europe If This Happens
No More Taxes Until the Fraud Stops
CNN Guest Tries Accusing ICE of Nazi Recruitment Tactics, Makes a Fool of...
Germany Finally Admits Trump Was Right About Energy
New York's Mamdani Doubles Down on Race-Based Government Policy
Gutfeld Eviscerates Jessica Tarlov for Defending Protesters Harassing ICE Agents
‘They Are Killing Their Own Children’: Iranian Commander’s Daughter Speaks Out Amid Nation...
Trump Threatens to Tariff Countries Opposing His Effort to Control Greenland
Pentagon Leaker Charged for Possessing Classified Documents on the Venezuela Raid
Venezuelan Opposition Leader Gifts President Trump Her Nobel Peace Prize
Tipsheet

Sen. Cassidy Explains Why He Flipped on the Constitutionality of an Impeachment Trial

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) was one of six Republicans to join Democrats in voting that it was constitutional to impeach a former president. His vote was seen as surprising considering he voted last month to end the proceedings, saying they were unconstitutional. According to the senator, his switch came down to how terrible former President Donald Trump's legal team was.

Advertisement

"I said I would be an impartial juror. Anyone listening to those arguments, the House [impeachment managers] were focused. They were organized. They relied on both precedent, the Constitution and legal scholars," he explained. "They made a compelling argument."

According to the Louisiana senator, President Trump's defense team were "disorganized" and did everything in their power to avoid talking about the constitutionality of the trial.

"When they did talk about it, they kind of glided over it, almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments," Cassidy said. "Now, if I'm an impartial juror and one side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I'm going to vote for the side that did the good job."

The main issue Cassidy said he had with the Trump defense team's arguments were that they failed to talk about the "issue at hand." Instead, their arguments were "random" and "disorganized."

As of now, the senator said, based on impartiality and arguments on constitutionality alone, the House impeachment managers did a better job.

Advertisement

There is still hope for the Trump team to win back Cassidy, at least on the conviction front. As of now, he said he doesn't know how he'll vote on convicting Trump for the one article of impeachment for "inciting a resurrection." 

“I have not yet decided on how I will vote,” he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos