Watch Scott Jennings Annihilate a CNN Host's Silly Question About the Anti-ICE Terror...
After This Answer From a Mamdani Supporter, You Can See How He Became...
Watch a NYT Columnist Obliterate the Left's Main Obsession in Less Than Six...
After This Court Ruling on Joe Biden's Tapes, the Lib Media Should Brace...
AZ Dems Facing Total Disaster in This Must-Win House Race
Socialist Candidate Says Those Who Listen to Marjorie Taylor Greene Will Vote for...
Roy Cooper Promises to Fight Big Insurance, So Why Is He Taking Campaign...
New York Politician Slams the DSA As a White Supremacist Movement
Did James Talarico Really Make Fun of Childhood Dyslexia?
While He Mulls Arresting Netanyahu, Zohran Mamdani Hosts an Actual Terrorist at Gracie...
Nicaragua Proves You Can Vote Your Way Into Socialism, but You Can't Vote...
New UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham Is Already Making Environmentalists Mad
Struggling in the Polls, Abdul El-Sayed Is Now Pretending He Likes Jews and...
A New York School District Is Testing a Cost Saving Measure for the...
A DSA Leader Just Gave the Most Baffling Definition of Socialism Yet
Tipsheet

Sen. Cassidy Explains Why He Flipped on the Constitutionality of an Impeachment Trial

Sen. Cassidy Explains Why He Flipped on the Constitutionality of an Impeachment Trial
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) was one of six Republicans to join Democrats in voting that it was constitutional to impeach a former president. His vote was seen as surprising considering he voted last month to end the proceedings, saying they were unconstitutional. According to the senator, his switch came down to how terrible former President Donald Trump's legal team was.

Advertisement

"I said I would be an impartial juror. Anyone listening to those arguments, the House [impeachment managers] were focused. They were organized. They relied on both precedent, the Constitution and legal scholars," he explained. "They made a compelling argument."

According to the Louisiana senator, President Trump's defense team were "disorganized" and did everything in their power to avoid talking about the constitutionality of the trial.

"When they did talk about it, they kind of glided over it, almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments," Cassidy said. "Now, if I'm an impartial juror and one side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I'm going to vote for the side that did the good job."

The main issue Cassidy said he had with the Trump defense team's arguments were that they failed to talk about the "issue at hand." Instead, their arguments were "random" and "disorganized."

As of now, the senator said, based on impartiality and arguments on constitutionality alone, the House impeachment managers did a better job.

Advertisement

There is still hope for the Trump team to win back Cassidy, at least on the conviction front. As of now, he said he doesn't know how he'll vote on convicting Trump for the one article of impeachment for "inciting a resurrection." 

“I have not yet decided on how I will vote,” he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos