Judge in Luigi Mangione Case Issues Ruling on Evidence
Jeanine Pirro Issues Threat to Parents of Children Who Participate in 'Teen Takeovers'
A Media Shallow Dive on Kash Patel 'Desecrating' Snorkeling Trip; Press Headaches Still...
The Left Keeps the Dream of Disenfranchising Red State Voters Alive
Scott Jennings Breaks Down Why the Left Gets So Violent When You Question...
Jon Ossoff Backs Anti-Voter ID, Soft on Crime Georgia Supreme Court Candidate Jen...
Behold the Inhumanity of the Left as ‘Journalists’ Mock the Death of Brian...
Secretary of Education Says She Put a Stop to FAFSA Fraud As Dead...
President Trump Just Made a Major Announcement About Iran
Stacey Abrams Admits Democrats Are Losing the Redistricting Battle—and It Goes Far Beyond...
Mamdani Reveals What He Believes Are the Nine Most Terrifying Words in the...
Wow, TrumpRx Is Going To Save How Much Money for Americans?
Trump Calls for Investigation Into Maryland Elections After Mail-In Ballot Disaster
Democrat Bob Brooks Claims To Be a "Working Class Fighter," But Can't Seem...
Active Shooter Situation On-Going at Islamic Center of San Diego
Tipsheet

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases

Liberal Law Professor Shreds Dems' Calls for ACB to Recuse Herself From Election-Related Cases
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley slammed Democrats' assertion that Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett should have to abstain from any cases related to the 2020 presidential election. According to Turley, there's no reason for Barrett not to participate simply because she was confirmed before an election.

Advertisement

"Jonathan, so that brings us to the fact that Justice now Amy Coney Barrett is in this position in this Court that is now nine, filling the spot of deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Democrats, during that hearing, were saying, 'You have to recuse yourself if an election case comes to the Supreme Court after November 3rd.' I assume we're going to hear that more," Fox News' Bret Baier said.

"It will and it's utterly ridiculous and it's also incredibly insulting. There's no reason under the usual interpretation of the standard for recusal for Justice Barrett to withdraw from this case," Turley explained. "She doesn't have an interest in this case. She doesn't have a financial interest in this case. She didn't work on underlying litigation or cases related to any appeal. None of those conditions exist."

"I know of no case in history where a justice would recuse herself simply because she was nominated shortly before an election and some people, as you heard, as a judicial shill," he said.

Advertisement

Related:

2020 ELECTION

Turley made the statement shortly before President Donald Trump addressed supporters around 2 a.m. Wednesday morning. The president made clear that he plans to litigate mail-in ballots in some of the key swing states. 

As of now, results from battleground states like Pennsylvania and Michigan might not be decided until the end of the week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement