CBS Unveils a ‘New’ Evening News After Losing America’s Trust
Seattle's New Mayor Joins the Left's Push to Classify Somali Fraud Investigations As...
‘Seize the Streets’: Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Issues Bold Call as Iran...
How To Destroy a Country
Newsom Delays Crackdown on Illegal Immigrant CDLs As Duffy's Jan. 5 Deadline Approaches
Unabashedly Enthusiastic About America
Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Is Free Market David Slaying Hollywood’s Outdated, Greedy Goliat...
Socialism in the City
Neither Shah Nor Supreme Leader: Can Iran's Theocracy Survive a Nation in Revolt?
Iran’s Fourth Uprising in Seven Years Shows a Resistance That Won’t Be Silenced
Winning the AI Race Requires Actually Competing
Federal Judge Orders Prison Sentences in Celebrity Romance Scam
Walz Unveils Paid Leave Program Amid Fallout From Massive Minnesota Fraud Scandals
This Fast Food Chain Is Launching a New Product to Celebrate America's 250th...
Why Paying Off Debt Matters More Than Ever in 2026
Tipsheet

DOJ Refuses To Hold Barr, Ross In Contempt. Here's Why.

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

The Department of Justice on Wednesday informed Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) they would not hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for failing to produce documents related to Congressional subpoenas.

Advertisement

According to Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, the author of Wednesday's letter, said federal courts realized the sensitivity of documents relating to the Trump administration's decision to ask a citizenship question on the 2020 Census. The documents were privileged, meaning they couldn't be used in civil litigation. 

Despite that, the Oversight Committee received roughly 30,000 pages of documents relating to the policy decision.

"The Department of Justice's long-standing position is that we will not prosecute an official for contempt of Congress for declining to provide information subject to a presidential assertion of executive privilege," Rosen wrote. "Across administrations of both parties, we have consistently adhered to the position that 'the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an Executive Branch official who asserts the President's claim of executive privilege.'"

Advertisement

Rosen cites multiple other instances where Department of Justice officials were not held in contempt for failing to respond to Congressional subpoenas. The most recent example was when the Republican-controlled House attempted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to to comply with Congressional subpoenas related to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning case that left Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry dead.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement