Grand Jury Indicts Former Olympian for Defacing Reflecting Pool
Separatist Group Admits to Killing US Pilot
Do Vague State Education Standards Open the Door to Classroom Activism?
The Left's Fascist Fallacy
Left Building Momentum to Pack Supreme Court
This Republican Has a Wild Idea for Fixing Housing Prices: Let the Market...
America Is Already Celebrating 250 Years of Freedom—And the Displays Are Spectacular
Trump Gives Hilarious Guest Appearance on Storytime With the Second Lady
British Police Don't Want You to Watch This Footage of Their Mistake
'Vandals' Tear Down Buffalo, NY Flag Celebrating Somali Independence
America's Homelessness System Must Pursue Self-Sufficiency, Not Simply Housing
Federal Court Block Trump Administration DEI Firings Just Days After Related SCOTUS Case
Today's Aviation Day Celebration Might Be the Most Patriotic Event of the Century
Illegal Alien SNAP Fraud Plot Resulted in 'Substantial Hardship' for Victims
Ex-Army Contractor Convicted in $1.1M MRE Theft Scheme at Ft. Bliss
Tipsheet

It Turns Out Democrats Once Waged War on Married Female Voters, and Guess Who It Helped

It Turns Out Democrats Once Waged War on Married Female Voters, and Guess Who It Helped
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

In their attacks on the SAVE America Act, the Democrats have decided to lie that married women will be unable to vote because they won't be able to match their married name with the name on their birth certificates. It's false, of course, because women can show their marriage licenses to prove that name change, of course, but the fear-mongering is the point.

Advertisement

It turns out this argument was not just rooted in fear-mongering but also in projection. We know that now because we were just reminded that there was a time Democrats were fine with disenfranchising married women if it meant helping former President Barack Obama get his early political career off the ground.

Check this out.

Here's more (emphasis added):

Democrats don't like it when you say that Barack Obama won his first election in 1996 by throwing all of his opponents off the ballot on technicalities.

By clearing out the incumbent and the others in his first Democratic primary for state Senate, Mr. Obama did something that was neither illegal nor even uncommon. But Mr. Obama claims to represent something different from old-style politics -- especially old-style Chicago politics. And the senator is embarrassed enough by what he did that he misrepresents it in the prologue of his political memoir, "The Audacity of Hope."

...

One local newspaper, Chicago weekend, reported that "[s]ome of the problems included printing registered voters same [sic] instead of writing, a female voter got married after she registered to vote and signed her maiden name, registered voters signed the petitions but don't live in the 13th district."

Advertisement

Incredible. Simply incredible. Democrats disenfranchised married women by finding those who used their middle names to sign petitions and challenging those signatures.

This needs far more attention.

This writer also remembers when the Democrats were trying to recall Scott Walker here in Wisconsin. Some of the recall petition signatures included "Mickey Mouse" and they were allowed to remain standing.

Because it's (D)ifferent when they do it.

They tried to throw President Trump off the ballot in several states in 2024.

Advertisement

Yes, it does radicalize people.

It's all projection. Pure projection.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos