New Polling Shows the Left's Climate Change Hysteria Losing Steam
America's Largest Muslim Advocacy Group Is Very Upset Their Pro-Hamas Encampment Is Gone
Time to Go: Police Begin Dismantling Pro-Hamas Camp at George Washington University
University of Ottawa Students Make a Big Error in Their Pro-Hamas Graffiti
Joe Biden Just Lost Another Battle With His Teleprompter
Biden's Use of TikTok Cited to Support Company's Lawsuit Against the Government
Gov. Abbott Has a Message for Texas Schools Following Biden's Title IX Rewrite
The 2024 Pulitzer Prizes Show the Focus Is Less on Journalism and More...
Department of Education's Move Forces Jewish Groups to Pull Out of Meeting
Sickening: 'Newcomer' Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Florida for Heinous Crime
The IRA Is Punishing Small Businesses and Putting Cancer Patients at Risk
House Dems Are Asking for Executive Action on the Border, but KJP of...
Boeing Cargo Plane Forced to Make Emergency Landing After Gear Fails
Vulnerable Dem Incumbent Sherrod Brown: Biden's Politics 'Not Much Different From Mine'
Here’s Why One Pharmaceutical Company Will Withdraw Its COVID-19 Vaccine
Tipsheet

Obama 'No Pork' Hedge

Barack Obama is playing semantics with his forthcoming spending bill.

The president-elect says he won't permit "members" to insert any earmarks in the $1 trillion spending bill he is crafting to stimulate the economy, but mayors aren't members and they're the ones hungry for some pork.
Advertisement


Today Obama promised to set "new higher standard of accountability, transparency and oversight. We are going to ban all earmarks, the process by which individual members insert projects without review" at a press conference. This may sound all well and good, but the pork in the bill that conservatives are upset about doesn't come from Washington lawmakers.

Obama requested mayors around the nation compile "shovel-ready" projects worthy of government funding and they responded with a whopping 800 pages worth of ideas, many of which would make the average taxpayer hopping mad. The final list, presented in a report called "The Mainstreet Recovery Ready to Go Infrastructure Project" contained $72.2 billion worth of projects that were essentially, earmarks.

The Wall Street Journal culled a list of the most offensive projects in an op-ed today. The "mayoral priorities" included:
$1 million to upgrade the Los Angeles County Convention Center elevated "catwalk" for cameras and lighting
$350,000 for an Albuquerque, N.M., fitness center;
$94 million for a parking garage at the Orange Bowl in Miami
$4.5 million for Gretna, Florida, to bottle water with recyclable bottles
$35 million music hall of fame in Florissant, Missouri
$3.1 million for a swimming pool in Tulsa.
$80,000 for a tennis facility in Santa Barbara
$6 million to renovate the beach at Surfers Point in Venice, California
$1.5 million to reduce prostitution with education programs in Dayton, Ohio
 and Ponce,
$5.7 million to improve a cruise ship terminal in Puerto Rico 
Advertisement

But we're not supposed to believe these are "earmarks" because they weren't submitted by U.S. senator or representative.  Granted, these projects are not guaranteed to be in the final bill, but have been requested. They are options on the table. It remains to be seen exactly what Obama will or will not approve. It

Citizens Against Government Waste has been on this since the report came out last month. President Tom Schatz said,  “It is outrageous that the mayors would use this economic crisis as an opportunity to obtain federal funding for these wasteful, low priority projects, which apparently offer excellent photo opportunities for them, but will do nothing to stimulate the economy in the long term.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement