The Reaction to the Death of the Iranian President Got Worse
Joe Biden's Executive Privilege Plot Is a Nixonian Throwback
The ‘Trump Never Conceded’ Lie
Now Males Invade Women's Rights Outrage, as Ron DeSantis Is Blocking a MAN's...
Silver Lining in Jen Psaki's Lie: Gold Star Family Gets Red Carpet Rollout...
Universities Breed Evil
Biden Lawsuit Against Sheetz Gas Will Enrage Pennsylvania Voters
Two Contrasting Congressional Days
The B(D)S Movement
Here's When Schumer Plans to Vote on the Border Bill
Biden Really Just Said This About an American Held Hostage by Hamas
Poll Spells Bad News for Biden in Arizona
Prosecution Rests in Trump's Hush Money Trial
Two Jordanian Nationals Tried to Breach a U.S. Military Base in Possible ISIS...
Members of Congress Are Actually Praising the ICC for Coming After Netanyahu

Public Financing

Over on Glamour magazine's political blog we are having some good discussion on why matching funds are bad for presidential campaigns.

Here's a part of what I posted yesterday:

"In theory, public financing would level the playing field between Obama, who raised $37 million in January alone, and cash-strapped McCain—exactly what those who cheer public financing think the system should do. (Never mind for now how outrageous it is to ask taxpayers to pony up $85 million for a candidate they may not even support.) The problem is that in a high-stakes presidential election, no one really wants to level the playing field, except the underdog. This explains why Obama thought it was so great before he found his fundraising groove. "

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos