Men Are Going to Strike Back
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Tipsheet

Abortion Groups Protest Kavanaugh, Launch Ad Campaign Targeting Vulnerable Republicans

The abortion advocacy group NARAL, along with Planned Parenthood and others, is claiming that President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, could overturn Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

NARAL launched an ad campaign Monday evening targeting five states to fight Kavanaugh’s nomination. The group attempts to frame him as “a vote to end Roe v. Wade, criminalize abortion, and punish women.”

“We need senators who understand it isn’t their place to play judge and jury on women,” NARAL says in their announcement. “The message is clear: every senator must stand unequivocally for our fundamental freedoms, or they will pay the price in November.”

The ads will run in Texas, Alaska, Maine, Colorado and Nevada. The group is specifically targeting vulnerable Senate Republicans including Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada.

Last week, NARAL and Planned Parenthood called on the Senate to demand a new “personal liberty standard” of forcing Supreme Court nominees to affirm the Roe v. Wade decision. Sen. Schumer agreed with the abortion groups’ standard Monday, arguing that nominees simply saying they would respect Roe as precedent was no longer enough.

Advertisement

Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL, said that this "personal liberty" standard was necessary and any of President Trump’s list of Supreme Court picks would “decimate our rights as enshrined under Roe.”

While declining to give his personal views on the matter, Kavanaugh has already said when he was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit in 2006 that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully. That would be binding precedent of the court. It has been decided by the Supreme Court."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement