The Squad Has a Meltdown Over Pro-Terrorism Encampments Getting Dismantled
New Polling Shows the Left's Climate Change Hysteria Losing Steam
America's Largest Muslim Advocacy Group Is Very Upset Their Pro-Hamas Encampment Is Gone
The Timing of the Police Raid at GWU Is Interesting
University of Ottawa Students Make a Big Error in Their Pro-Hamas Graffiti
Joe Biden Just Lost Another Battle With His Teleprompter
Biden's Use of TikTok Cited to Support Company's Lawsuit Against the Government
Gov. Abbott Has a Message for Texas Schools Following Biden's Title IX Rewrite
The 2024 Pulitzer Prizes Show the Focus Is Less on Journalism and More...
Here’s Why This Democrat Rep Thinks NPR Is 'Necessary’ for Americans
Department of Education's Move Forces Jewish Groups to Pull Out of Meeting
Sickening: 'Newcomer' Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Florida for Heinous Crime
The IRA Is Punishing Small Businesses and Putting Cancer Patients at Risk
House Dems Are Asking for Executive Action on the Border, but KJP of...
Boeing Cargo Plane Forced to Make Emergency Landing After Gear Fails
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Tosses Ruling Against Christian Florist Who Refused to Do Arrangements for Gay Wedding

The Supreme Court vacated a 2017 Washington state court ruling Monday that a Christian florist violated an anti-discrimination measure when she declined to make flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding. 

Advertisement

In an unsigned order, the high court sent the case back to the Washington State Supreme Court asking them to revisit their ruling in light of the court’s ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission in which they ruled 7-2 in favor of a Christian baker who declined to make a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.

Barronelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene's Flowers, refused on religious grounds in 2013 to do flower arrangements for the wedding of Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed.

The Supreme Court has handed the case back to the Washington Supreme Court "for further consideration in light" of the ruling in favor of Colorado baker Jack Phillips, however, that ruling was very narrow in scope.

It focused primarily on the hostility of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission towards Phillips’s religious beliefs in violation of his free speech rights. It did not address generally whether businesses can decline services to same-sex weddings because of religious beliefs.

Stutzman’s attorney, Kristen Waggoner with Alliance Defending Freedom, argued in a statement Monday that the florist’s case is similar to Phillips.

“The U.S. Supreme Court has rightfully asked the Washington Supreme Court to reconsider Barronelle’s case in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision,” she explained. “In that ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court denounced government hostility toward the religious beliefs about marriage held by creative professionals like Jack and Barronelle. The state of Washington, acting through its attorney general, has shown similar hostility here.”

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), representing the couple in the case, is arguing that the high court’s order does not constitute a determination on the case’s merits.

“To be clear, the court made no indication the lower courts ruled incorrectly and made no decision on the case’s merits,” James Esseks, director of the ACLU’s LGBT and HIV Project, said in a statement.

“We are confident that the Washington State Supreme Court will rule once again in favor of the same-sex couple, and reaffirm its decision that no business has a right to discriminate,” he added. “Our work to ensure LGBT equality is the law and the norm in all 50 states will continue.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement