Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Columbia University's Pro-Hamas Activists Vow to Defend Camp Against Police Action
Capitalism Versus Racism
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Anti-Censorship Group Canceled by Pro-Hamas Authors
Mike Johnson Is a Hero
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
There's No Right to Sleep Outdoors
State Department: Ukraine Has 'Significant' Human Rights Issues
The Alarming Implications of Trump's Immunity Claim
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
1968 Returns as Biden’s Nightmare
The Greatest Challenge to DeSantis' Legacy in Florida
Senate Passes Foreign Aid Package, Sending It to President Biden to Sign
Tipsheet

Judge Temporarily Blocks Iowa Law That Bans Abortion After a Heartbeat Is Detected

Judge Michael Huppert in Iowa temporarily halted a law Friday that bans abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected. Since a fetal heartbeat can be detected at around six weeks into the pregnancy, the measure is the most restrictive abortion ban in the nation.

Advertisement

Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union brought a legal challenge against the measure shortly after Gov. Kim Reynolds signed the law earlier in May dubbing it “beyond extreme.”

Abortion groups are arguing that the law, which would’ve taken effect July 31, is unconstitutional as it would ban abortion at a point prior to the time women even know they’re pregnant.

"Not only is this law blatantly unconstitutional — it's extremely harmful to women," Planned Parenthood commented on the lawsuit filed on behalf of Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and the Emma Goldman Clinic in Iowa City.

ACLU of Iowa Legal Director Rita Bettis praised Judge Huppert’s decision to issue the injunction Friday.

"Women in Iowa don't have to live with the burden of that uncertainty of knowing whether or not they'll have abortion rights come July 1," Bettis said.

Advertisement

Martin Cannon, an attorney with the Thomas More Society, the firm representing the state in the case, told Iowa Public Radio that they wouldn’t fight the injunction.

“We’d like to get to the merits of the case sooner, without just rehashing old ground,” Cannon said. “We think that we’ll have a better resolution, sooner, if we skip this step.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement