Here's a Liberal Policy That Now Has Bill Maher 'Incensed'
Watch Don Lemon Shut Down WaPo's Taylor Lorenz Over This Take About Gaza...
There’s a Massive Pushback Brewing Against the Pro-Hamas Thugs Taking Over College Campuse...
The Left’s New School Choice Playbook in Arkansas Serves as a National Warning
Joe Biden Hands Out Obamacare to Illegal Immigrants
Democrat Massachusetts Gov. Approves $400 Million In Freebies for Illegal Immigrants
In Case You Didn't Know, Roads and Bridges Are Now 'Racist'
Joe Biden's Economic Advisor Has No Idea How 'Bidenomics' Work
Americans Overwhelmingly Describe Trump As Strong Leader, A Stark Contrast of What They...
Democrat Accused of 'Deliberately' Misleading Arizona House to Host Drag Story Hour at...
Jewish Organizations Abruptly Pull Out of Meeting With Biden Admin After Addition of...
Supporters of President Trump Should Not Support Biden’s DOJ or its Dark Antitrust...
The Truth About the CIA
The Left’s Radicalization Of Our Children
Holly Rehder: The Only MAGA Candidate in the Race for Missouri Lt. Governor
Tipsheet

John Roberts Joins Liberal Justices in Ruling on Louisiana Abortion Law

AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

Late Thursday night, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a bill in Louisiana that would have enforced more abortion restrictions. In the 5-4 ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts joined with his liberal colleagues on the court.

Advertisement

The state law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, a demand that some argued would have shuttered multiple abortion clinics.

Pro-abortion advocates cheered the court's tight ruling and noted how both of President Trump's Supreme Court picks dissented.

In his dissent, newest Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the court ruled prematurely. Slate interpreted that to mean he is, indeed, "declaring war on Roe v. Wade."

Meanwhile, the law's pro-life proponents are hoping to appeal the decision.

Roberts voted in favor of a similar abortion law in Texas in 2016. The court struck that law down in the case Whole Woman's Health vs. Hellerstedt, arguing it would be an undue burden on women. Roberts issued a dissent at the time. This time, however, it seems he decided to vote via precedent.

Advertisement

As some conservatives noted, the math just doesn't add up.

Of course, he was also a conservative spoiler during the whole Obamacare individual mandate debate in 2012.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement