Michael Medved: Double Standards In The War Between White House And Media

Below is your personal RSS feed link, generated just for you - please do not share it!
https://townhall.com/podcastfeed/vip/townhallreview?m=

You can get your link from the Podcast show page, which you can paste into the listening app of your choice. For most apps, you can do this by clicking "Add a show by URL" or "Add by RSS feed". You can find app-specific instructions below.

Apple Podcasts
  • Open your Library
  • Tap or click Add a show by URL
  • Paste the link above
Google Podcasts
  • Tap or click Activity on the bottom right of your screen
  • Scroll to Subscriptions on the top and then tap the 3-dot menu
  • Tap or click Add by RSS feed
  • Paste the link above
Townhall Review
July 7, 2017
For all his vast power, the President of the United States is always at a structural disadvantage in a “war” with the media. The First Amendment protects press rights to criticize the government, and everyone expects such criticism. But if government—or the president, as head of government—strikes back by assailing media, there’s an uneasy hint of bullying or oppression.

President Trump isn’t exceptional in generating media hostility, but Barack Obama was exceptional in avoiding such scrutiny for eight years. What’s more, there’s a double standard on defining victory in battles between the administration and the press. CNN would celebrate if it ever won 20 percent of the available viewing audience, but presidential approval ratings of just 20 percent would undermine chances for legislative and re-election success.

A president can’t win by exclusively catering to his most enthusiastic base, but a cable news operation can’t lose if it solely rallies its hard-core fans.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.