Salem Media to Be Acquired by WaterStone in Major Growth Deal
Disappointment Doesn't Come Close to Describing What Just Happened in South Carolina
Scott Jennings Couldn't Let This Insane Take on Redistricting Slide on CNN Last...
AOC Bashes MTG As Progressives Seek Common Ground
Those Defending the Nazi Candidate Want a Republican to Quit When Someone Else...
Here's Why a Catholic Counselor Is Suing the State of Oregon
Twin Cities Voters Are Learning the Consequences of Minimum Wage Laws
A Democratic Fantasy World
Experts Miss Trump's Enduring Presence in American Politics in Indiana Races
Marco Rubio to Attend China Summit With Trump, Even Though the Country Banned...
Kash Patel Claps Back in Fiery Senate Hearing As Chris Van Hollen Accuses...
Kuwait Confirms Iranian Security Breach at Strategic Port Project
US Appeals Court Restores President Trump's Second Round of Tariffs
The Missouri Supreme Court Just Solidified a Republican Redistricting Victory
ICE Uncovered a Massive Immigration Fraud Scheme
Notebook

A Professor Attempts to Indoctrinate a Student But Fails Miserably

A Professor Attempts to Indoctrinate a Student But Fails Miserably

My alma mater, Northern Arizona University (NAU), came under fire after a student, Cailin Jeffers, had a point taken off of a paper, because she used the word "mankind" instead of "humanity."

Advertisement

Campus Reform obtained copies of an email Jeffers received from Dr. Anne Scott, the professor who docked points on the student's paper.

Seriously? Since when is using the term "mankind" political? I could maybe understand the professor wanting to use "gender-neutral" language, if Jeffers was enrolled in a women's and genders studies class; but an English class is a bit absurd. 

After all, the term "mankind" literally means "the human race."

To make matters even worse, Dr. Scott sent a mass email to the class about her student's use of "diction" - warning that other grades could suffer. 

I don't understand liberal propaganda like this. It's a word. It's in the dictionary. It has a meaning. Just because you're construing a word to mean something completely different, doesn't mean the definition has changed - no matter how much you advocate for that change.

"In the English Dept. (and in almost all universities, and for at least 25 years now), we acknowledge this fact about language and we want our students to respect the nuances of meaning that words implicitly have, the assumptions we make, often erroneously, about what these words may mean for the general public, and to be sensitive to our word choices for the sake of writing dispassionately and objectively in our classes," Dr. Scott wrote in an email to her students.

Advertisement

Translation: You're in a university class, on a college campus and you must respect the safe space we've created here. If you challenge it, without even trying, then you're doing something wrong.

Translation number two: Universities and colleges across the country have been trying to indoctrinate our youth for at least 25 years, and we're not about to stop now. Sit down, shut up and accept what we're telling you...because we have degrees that say we're "experts" on anything and everything.


Do students now need to ask every author what their preferred pronoun is? What about those authors that are dead? 

This is the kind of liberal indoctrination that absolutely irritates me. It was going to school at NAU and being involved in political activism that reaffirmed two things for me: one, I'm a conservative; and two, I will do everything in my power to make sure conservative voices are heard a predominantly leftist safe haven. 

NAU, you taught me a lot, but one thing you didn't do was indoctrinate me. And I will call you out, just like I do with every case of liberal propaganda and abuse.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement