America’s Midwest is freezing. Mainstream media outlets had no option but to inform readers of the heavy snow and dangerous low temperatures.
Today, nearly 40 percent of Americans woke up to wind chill warnings or advisories on Wednesday. Over the next few days, 72 percent of the continental US population will experience below freezing temperatures.
Snowstorms and cold winds blasted through the Midwest on Tuesday, causing widespread chaos. Some 1,700 flights were cancelled nationwide as of Wednesday morning. Many roads in the Midwest remained dangerous to drive. Postal service was disrupted in many states.
Chicago was hit hard. The National Weather Service issued a warning for Wednesday, asking citizens to exert utmost caution as temperatures remained in negative double digits, with wind chills making them feel 20 to 30 degrees colder yet. Exposed skin could experience frostbite in as little as two or three minutes.
Schools remained closed in Chicago, and Amtrak cancelled all trains to and from Chicago for Wednesday. Conditions became so dangerous that Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker issued a disaster proclamation.
Minneapolis hit an all-time record low of minus 27 degrees, beating its 1966 record. As of Wednesday morning, Indianapolis officially tied its record low of minus 11 degrees, also set in 1966. And 1966, you might recall, came at the height of fears of global cooling.
Across the Atlantic, Britain also experienced severe cold from the Arctic air outbreak Wednesday. Schools in many parts were shut, many roads were unusable, and forecasters warned of more snow and ice as temperatures plunged across the Isles.
But isn’t global warming supposed to cause an increase in average temperature? Aren’t we supposed to experience milder winters? That is what we were told.
In the previous decade, climate alarmists made bold claims such as “snow will be a thing of the past” and the “Arctic will be completely gone.” But, time and again, their claims have failed to match reality.
Pressed by the need to sustain their narrative, they began rephrasing terminologies. Global warming became climate change. Any cold phase is coined a “weather event,” a phenomenon unassociated with long-term warming. Now, almost all climate doomsday theorists claim that severe winters do not disprove global warming.
The alarmist/doomsday logic is simple: When it’s warm, it’s because of “global warming”; when it’s cold, it’s just “weather.”
As a climate scientist myself, I find it embarrassing to be associated with such inconsistency.
What’s wrong with it?
While the current freeze is a “weather event,” it is also a part of the ongoing long-term climate events, namely the “global warming hiatus” and the “solar minimum.”
One of the major reasons for this hiatus is the reduction in sunspot activity. This is referred to as a “solar minimum,” a factor that influences the temperature levels on earth significantly more than any other. The “Maunder minimum” brought on the Little Ice Age of the 16th century.
Contrary to popular belief, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are not the primary control knob of global temperature.
Despite the steady and exponential increase in carbon dioxide emissions during the past three decades, global temperature failed to rise significantly in the last two decades. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have been out of sync with temperature in the last 70 years.Historical records show no evidence for carbon dioxide controlling global temperature.
The severe, long winter of 2017–2018and the current historic cooling may be part of a global climate cool down—or they may not be. It is too early to conclude. Climatologists are waiting to see how the next sunspot cycle (solar cycle) will play out.
It is important to remember that the current cold phase (2018–2019) contradicts the climate doomsday theory, which had originally predicted milder winters. It also contrasts with claims of global temperatures rising to unprecedented levels.
There is no reason to trust the forecasts of global warming doomsday theorists. Neither is there any guarantee that they won’t reverse to warning of global cooling, and blaming human activity for that, as they did in the 1960s and early 1970s—before they warned of global warming, and blamed human activity for that, too.
To summarize the current climatic events, we need to ask two questions:
1. Are we experiencing dangerous man-made global warming and catastrophic climate change?
2. Are we beginning to experience global cooling?
If we were ever to be doomed by climate change, it won’t be because of global warming but because of global cooling. Cold is much more dangerous than heat. One example among many: cold snaps kill ten times as many people per day as heat waves.
Fighting global warming by substituting diffuse, low-density, high-cost, low-reliability wind and solar for concentrated, high-density, low-cost, high-reliability fossil fuels won’t save us from warming, but it will make us unprepared for cooling if it comes.
Vijay Jayaraj (M.Sc., Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, England), Research Associate for Developing Countries for the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation, lives in Chennai, India.