Thom Tillis Makes Another Silly Decision
Another US Women's Hockey Player Tosses Cold Water on Media's Narrative About the...
Brady Tkachuk Answered the Most Ridiculous Question From the Canadian Press About Trump
Should John Fetterman Consider Switching Parties? It Makes Sense, But There's a Catch
Pronoun Twitter Will Melt Down Over How Members of the Men's Hockey Team...
After These Remarks From the US Women's Hockey Team, the Media Should End...
Who Will Win Texas' Democratic Senate Primary? This Poll Might Have the Answer.
A News Crew Visited Downtown Portland to See If Things Improved. Guess How...
Dear Diary: Jim Acosta Lost the Plot on the State of American Media
Another Career Criminal Was Set Free by Leftist Prosecutors. Now a Fairfax County...
Maryland Sheriffs Blast Democrats for Obstructing ICE Cooperation
Philly Is Being Sued by Five Police Officers. Here's Why.
Gavin Newsom Reveals Which Potential Heir to the MAGA Movement 'Scares' Him
Gutfeld Says Democrats’ Ego Cost Them at State of the Union
We Can’t Wait on Washington to Secure the Vote
OPINION

South Dakota AG Testing Ethics of Republican Attorneys General Association

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
South Dakota AG Testing Ethics of Republican Attorneys General Association
AP Photo/Dirk Lammers, File

I am no lawyer, but I am surprised that more people are not upset that the South Dakota Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg has not resigned. He made history, the bad kind, when he became the first constitutional officer in South Dakota to be impeached by the South Dakota House of Representatives. This controversy revolved around him hitting and killing a pedestrian with a car, then not reporting the incident until the next day. 

Advertisement

It is a case like this one that calls into questions the ethics of the legal profession, and the Republican Attorneys General Association in particular, at a time when many Americans see rules for elites differing from the rules imposed on average Americans.

Look no further than mask mandates that only seem to apply to regular people, yet not to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and President Joe Biden. Those two leaders were at an event last week to swear in a new Supreme Court Justice, and they were maskless. Pelosi later tested positive for Covid-19, yet the spokesman for the Biden Administration claimed that all protocols were followed. I guarantee that any event with politicians and constituents these days will not allow regular people anywhere near a politician without a mask, yet politicians going maskless is excused by federal politicians who believe the rules don’t apply to them. We are also seeing a similar double standard play out today in South Dakota.

The Ravnsborg case has become national news because of the unusual fact pattern in his case. The Argus Leader reported on April 12, 2022, “according to the South Dakota Highway Patrol, Ravnsborg's vehicle left the roadway prior to striking Boever, who'd been walking along the shoulder of Highway 14 near Highmore in the nighttime hours of Sept. 12, 2020.” The police tasked with investigating the accident found him “distracted” and that he “was not forthcoming about what caused the distraction and indicated he may have seen Boever's body prior to leaving the crash scene.” Nobody was alerted to the death of the pedestrian until the following morning when “Ravnsborg reported discovering the body after returning to Highmore to drop off a loaner vehicle he used to get home the night prior.” It appears that the South Dakota House of Representatives is not buying the story of Ravnsborg and is believing the police investigators.

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

The South Dakota public safety department also discovered some disturbing details. Craig Price, Cabinet Secretary for the SD Department of Public Safety wrote the Speaker of the SD House, Spencer Gorch on March 9, 2022, that “in interviews with investigators, AG Ravnsborg verbally indicated that he had seen Mr. Boever at the time of the impact, and again in the aftermath of the crash, before quickly correcting himself.” That is damning information that might have helped many South Dakota Republican members of the House to vote for impeachment. 

The impeachment is not a partisan issue evidenced by the fact that the House voted 36-31 for impeachment in a body that consists of 62 Republicans and 8 Democrats. Republican elected officials in South Dakota supported the measure, yet the Republican AG seems to be digging in for a fight when the impeachment moves to the next phase in the South Dakota Senate. That body is broken down 35-3 Republican versus Democrat. 

If you are following the news, the day Ravnsborg was impeached the New York Lieutenant Governor resigned after being arrested in a bribery case. He stepped down after the governor called for his resignation. Many in South Dakota have asked the same of the South Dakota Attorney General with different results.

One would think, at a minimum, Ravnsborg would be put on probation or suspended from the Republican Attorneys General Association pending a resolution of this controversy. If you thought that, you would be wrong. To date, no action has been taken by a group that proclaims they are in the business of “Defending the Rule of Law.” At a minimum, Ravnsborg should be put on the sidelines of being a member because of the appearance of impropriety.

Advertisement

It drives Americans crazy when they see one set of rules applied to them and another set of rules applied to elected politicians. One would think that an ethical Attorney General would resign in shame if there were any allegations of misconduct that surfaced to keep the office of Attorney General above reproach. To date, this is not the case.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement