Wait, That's How Scott Pelley Reacted to His Firing From CBS News?
John Cornyn Stepped on a Social Media Landmine...and the Results Were Very Messy
Iranian Dual Citizen Busted for Supplying Equipment to Tehran
Bernie Sanders Says the Socialist Part Out Loud With New Artificial Intelligence Bill
The Associated Press Is Married to Protecting Islam at Any Cost
Scott Pelley and Bari Weiss Respond to Pelley's Termination From CBS
Some of Scott Pelley’s Comments Explain the Type of Man He Is and...
California’s New Congressional Map May Have Just Backfired on Gavin Newsom
This Democrat Just Stormed Out of Marco Rubio's House Hearing
Katie Porter Falls Flat in California's Gubernatorial Race
Democrats' Maine Senate Gamble Raises Questions About Standards
Detransitioner Chloe Cole Testifies on Devastating Effects of Transition
Kansas Woman Sentenced for $450K Benefits Fraud Using Dead Relative’s Identity
Yes, People Still Voted for Eric Swalwell
'Fascist Collaborator': Bravo Host Goes Off the Rails Over Scott Pelley's Firing From...
OPINION

Coronavirus Paid Sick Leave Benefit Not What the Doctor Ordered

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Coronavirus Paid Sick Leave Benefit Not What the Doctor Ordered
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In the throes of the 2008 financial crisis, Obama’s former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel famously quipped, “you never let a serious crisis go to waste.” Now, 12 years later and in the midst of a different kind of crisis, lawmakers are singing a similar tune as they ram a coronavirus “stimulus” package down the throats of American taxpayers. On Wednesday, March 11, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cali.) and other top Democrats introduced a no-holds-barred legislative package creating a new federal sick leave program and ramping up unemployment insurance. Democrats mistakenly believe that the strong hand of government can keep the coronavirus at bay, when in reality, only a robust private response can keep patients safe and the economy afloat. As hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide fight COVID-19, half-baked policy prescriptions at taxpayer expense are certainly not what the doctor ordered.

Advertisement

The multi-billion dollar package (no exact figures as of time of writing) significantly expands unemployment insurance reimbursements for states and, astoundingly, creates a one-year federal paid sick leave benefit program financed via Social Security. Coronavirus victims, quarantine participants, or those caring for loved ones with the ailment are eligible to receive compensation “equal to 2/3 of the individual’s average monthly earnings” (and not exceeding $4,000 a month) for up to three months’ time. This gargantuan program would put taxpayers on the line for significant sick leave expenses, while crowding out private companies’ already-generous paid sick leave programs. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Seventy-three percent of private industry workers had paid sick leave benefits available from their employers in March 2019 [latest available data].”

It’s bizarre that lawmakers insist on duplicating benefits for more than 7 in 10 workers on taxpayers’ dime instead of trying to find a narrow way to target (i.e. means-testing) the workers who do not have those benefits. Additionally, a one-size-fits-all federal paid sick leave program fails to consider the array of health differences faced by millions of patients currently under doctors’ watchful eyes. Because there’s a limited number of COVID-19 tests available, “suspicious” patients who have come into contact with COVID-19 patients are encouraged to self-quarantine out of an abundance of caution.

Advertisement

Many of these individuals are perfectly healthy in their own right or only have a handful of mild symptoms and can effectively work from home. But, these individuals would be given the green light to take paid sick leave under the proposed legislation, since “eligible individuals” include individuals instructed to keep to themselves by direction of a healthcare provider, employer, or a local, state, or federal official. And it’s hard to argue with taking free money for no work, instead of…well, working from home for money. Thanks to the poor, expansive wording of the Democrats’ bill, millions of workers would rush to sideline themselves at a time when a contagion of fear and cancelled contracts is wreaking havoc on the economy.

There are far better alternatives to this anti-stimulus being rushed through the House. The federal government can be doing far more to encourage telework, including increasing the generosity of the home office tax deduction offered for the business use of taxpayers’ homes. Currently, Uncle Sam lets remote workers deduct $5 per square foot of their home office (up to 300 square feet of space) off of their taxes. Ahead of Tax Day lawmakers can double this write-off and send a message that there’s nothing wrong with working from home. Members of Congress should also follow President Trump’s suggestion to lower payroll tax rates and let workers keep more of their hard-earned dollars during such a scary, uncertain time in America. These pro-growth policies, not ill-considered, open-ended spending plans, will be key to our recovery from the coronavirus.

Advertisement

The country is looking to Congress and the president for leadership in this time of crisis.  Writing a blank check will do nothing for the physical or fiscal health of the nation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement