As We Vote, Here's Why Kamala's Interview With a Muslim Influencer Never Got...
One Dearborn Voter's Damning Observation About Kamala
This Video Out of California Shows Why Voter ID Laws Are Necessary
The Liberal Media Is Seething Right Now Heading Into Election Day
Election Day Is Not the Finish Line
Trump Has Reason in Pennsylvania to Feel Better Than Harris
Is It Too Early to Talk 2028?
Thank God for the Electoral College
Trump's Closing Message to Voters
Do the Unrighteous Now Outnumber the Righteous in America?
Voter Turnout and Ballot Completion Is Everything
Texas Tells DOJ Election Monitors to Pound Sand
The Elites Are About to Hand Trump a Second Term
Kamala Harris’ Energy Policies Are More Extreme and Harmful Than Biden’s
Abortion: America’s Worst Vice
OPINION

Candidates Matter

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Chris Christie won in New Jersey; Ken Cuccinelli lost in Virginia. Whatever can we make of that?

I was in a wonderfully interesting meeting yesterday with a man named Brian Loughnane who is the Federal Director of the Liberal Party of Australia. Under the odd-to-our-ears naming conventions, the Liberal Party of Australia is the center-right party and currently controls the government under Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

Advertisement

In the course of our conversation at the International Republican Institute offices in downtown DC, we got into a discussion of Tuesday's election results. I said I could describe the results in two words:

Candidates matter.

In New Jersey, Governor Christie cruised to an easy re-election because he is a good candidate, is seen as having been a good Governor, and has the trust of New Jersey residents to be a good steward of the Statehouse for another four years - assuming he hasn't moved into the White House before then.

In Virginia, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli lost to Terry McAuliffe by about three percentage points largely because of his (Cuccinelli's) hard line on social issues: abortion, climate change, same-sex marriage, etc. that McAuliffe drove home especially in DC suburbs known as Northern Virginia - Fairfax and Arlington counties along with Alexandria City.

Exit polls are useful not so that we know at the top of every hour which races to call even though only a handful of precincts have been counted. They are useful to determine why the people who came out to vote, voted the way they did.

For instance, Gov. Christie got nearly 61 percent of the vote in a very blue state in spite of the fav/unfav of the GOP in New Jersey: 39% favorable - 57% unfavorable. And don't tell me Christy didn't run as a Republican. Even in New Jersey they know the difference between an "R" and a "D" on the ballot.

Advertisement

So, how did he run up such a huge margin? First of all his opponent was very weak and all but unknown even down the stretch. Always a good thing for the incumbent. But in the exit poll on the question: "How is Christie handling the economy?" the response was 63% approve - 35% disapprove. An almost 30 percentage point advantage.

A more local issue, how Christie handled Hurricane Sandy voters gave Christy the nod 85 percent approve, 14 percent disapprove.

Meanwhile, back in the Old Dominion, asked what were the most important issues, respondents put abortion fourth among four choices behind (in order) the economy, health care, and transportation.

Four years ago Republican candidate for Governor Bob McDonnell had as his mind numbing campaign slogan: "Bob's for Jobs." That got McDonnell 100,000 more votes four years ago than McAuliffe got last night.

Oh, the third party candidate in Virginia? The Libertarian? Before you say if he hadn't been in the race Cuccinelli would have won, CNN's political unit points out that "exit polls indicate McAuliffe would have beaten Cuccinelli by 7 points (50%-43%)" instead of the 2½ percentage points he did win by.

And don't bother blaming incumbent Bob McDonnell because of the ongoing gift investigation. Among Virginia voters his approve/disapprove is a very healthy +12: 53% - 41%. That is far better than the marks given to President Obama which were 46 percent approve - 53 percent disapprove, an anemic minus 7.

Advertisement

In New Jersey, among those who strongly support the Tea Party, Christie got 88 percent of the vote. Conservatives were opposed to Obamacare by 53-46 outside the margin of error, but not the animosity Republicans are hoping for. In Virginia they were nearly evenly split: 48% supporting, 50% opposed.

Over the course of the evening the Twitterverse was in full throat.

At one point historian Michael Beschloss Tweeted:

First Governors of Virginia after July 4, 1776 were Patrick Henry & Thomas Jefferson.

To which I responded:Conclusion? Darwin was wrong.

Candidates matter.

On the Secret Decoder Ring page today: A link to the CNN.com summary of the exit polls (click on the links within the article for the data). If you missed the MULLINGS subscription drive, that info will stay on the SDR for a week or so.

Also a pretty good license plate Mullfoto.

-

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos