Is This Really the Woman Who Can Help Harris With Her Blue Wall...
Kamala Is in Serious Trouble in Michigan
And Now The Atlantic Might Become Engulfed in a Journalistic Scandal for This...
I'm Shocked This MSNBC Host Didn't Self-Combust After Hearing What Philly Voters Had...
Kamala Again Got Asked This Question About Biden's Mental Health. She Did Another...
Unleash the Power of Persuasion
Play Time/Jail Time
Court Rules NY Can't Deny Second Amendment Rights to Poor People
'Release the Memes': Babylon Bee Scores Free Speech Win After Newsom Tried to...
Trump-Vance Campaign Files FEC Complaint Over Labour Staffers Coming to US to Campaign...
Is This a Sign the Left Is Having Buyer's Remorse Over Harris?
A Democrat Running in a Swing District Claimed to Support Border Security. Her...
Jennings Calls Out Cheney for One of Her Worst Comments While Campaigning With...
Fact Check: No, but Seriously, Did Kamala Harris Really Ever Work at a...
AOC Has a Meltdown About Trump Working at McDonald's
OPINION

In Defense of Imperialism

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Some folks will never learn to leave more than well enough alone. Specifically, those nationalists in Scotland, along with their counterparts in Catalonia, who would like to break away and set up their own independent country. Never mind that the Scottish National Party has already lost one referendum, and the Catalans are deeply divided about the wisdom of turning their regional elections into a vote for independence.

Advertisement

Both regions now enjoy the best of both worlds: the security of belonging to a larger country and unhampered access to the market it provides. But there's no reasoning with nationalism once it gets carried away -- even if independence would invite ruinous results.

Imperialism has become a dirty word in our politically correct lexicon, yet throughout history it has offered minorities like the Scots and Catalans a degree of protection, and the world a degree of stability, no other system could. That's been true at least since the Romans ruled the known world, and then were followed by a succession of other great empires.

The Ottomans once held sway from Algiers to Baghdad, and it was said the sun never set on the British Empire. Now that it's been broken apart, its former possessions in Africa have been reduced to ruin, anarchy and misrule by murderous tyrants like Idi Amin and his like.

The Austro-Hungarian Empire in the heart of Europe preserved the peace -- and protected the rights of an array of disparate peoples for half a century under good Franz Josef.

Yes, there are empires and there are empires. No one would confuse the Mongols with humanitarians, and the Russian empire has long been a prison-house of peoples. But those are scarcely the only models for imperialism, which can benefit both rulers and the ruled.

However unwillingly, this country, too, has amassed an empire, beginning with the Spanish-American War and its conquests. And when this country withdraws from the world, it leaves a vacuum that is soon filled by terrorists claiming to be a government. See the Middle East today. Having neglected the spreading civil war in Syria for some five years, with its ripples of refugees now spreading out all over Europe and beyond, this administration has invited suffering far and wide.

Advertisement

It's time -- past time -- that we stopped being paralyzed by a word -- imperialism -- and recognized not just the uses of imperialism but that, in these chaotic times, it can be a moral imperative.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, who ought to have known, once said the American presidency "is pre-eminently a place of moral leadership." Which candidate for president understands that now? Its current occupant doesn't seem to. Let's hope the next president of the United States will.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos