This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
OPINION

GOP Lawmaker Equates Sebelius to North Korea

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Apparently there is no such thing as a free lunch… But there is such a thing as free birth control. At least that’s according to Health and Human Services secretary, Kathleen Sebelius. According to the healthcare.gov business wiz (sarcasm), preventative care, maternity care, contraception and abortifacients are all “free.” Glossing over the fact that these services are being paid for by someone, the health secretary engaged in a fiery exchange with Republican Representative John Shimkus (IL) over the issue.

Advertisement

Shortly after Sebelius made the assertion that no one will pay, directly or indirectly, for the mandated expansion in insurance coverage, another heated exchange erupted as Shimkus cut the Secretary’s answer short. There was, evidently, some debate over whether or not the Secretary had the right to finish her answer. Honestly, this was a silly argument given her clear intention to verbally tap dance around the question.

The Illinois Republican (and I do mean the Republican from Illinois) was trying to make the point that nothing in life is free. While there may be no copays or additional out-of-pocket cost for preventative care, it is highly unlikely the insurance companies will simply eat the additional cost for the sake of upholding the administration’s promise of all-you-can-take Sandra Fluke style healthcare.

If Sebelius truly believed her argument (that these services are actually “free”) she is exactly the person who used-car-salesmen pray will walk onto their lot. She’s the type of person that will believe a $60,000 vehicle comes with “free” heated seats… Heck, she might even believe that if you pay $60,000 for the seats they’ll throw the car in for free.

Advertisement

Providers of preventative care will not be volunteering their time. Insurance companies will not forgo calculating the cost of additional services into premiums, fees or other profit generating business endeavors. And consumers will, in the end, bear the burden of higher premiums. In fact, increased premiums are one of the many reasons that images of the Hindenburg race through the mind as Obamacare unfolds its ugly truth to Americans. (OH THE HUMANITY!!!)

Such comprehensive ignorance of economic truths, however, underscore far more than just Sebelius’s misunderstanding of the word “free.” Such foundationally perverted views of what “free” services mean also explains the entitlement mentality that is rampant throughout America. Everything seems “free” when you’re talking about someone else’s money. According to people like Sebelius, government mandates have no cost to businesses or consumers, because – quite frankly – it’s not her check book that is impacted by the regulations.

In his frustration over explaining basic business math to the bureaucrat who now controls 1/6th of the US economy, Shimkus compared the Secretary to North Korea. The real outrage (according to the media) is that Shimkus lost his temper and made a “regrettable” analogy. (In the congressman’s defense, he probably wanted to equate her with a soviet propaganda chief… But was afraid that she would take the analogy as a compliment.)

Advertisement

And, to be fair, the analogy was a little bit of a stretch. I mean, heck, at least North Korea would have had the decency to drag Congressman Shimkus out of the hearing in shackles.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement