YouTuber Ms Rachel Just Cut a Campaign Check. Take a Wild Guess of...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
Disbarred for Defending Trump: ACLJ Takes the Fight to the Supreme Court
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
USA Today Gets Tripped by Its Caitlin Clark Opposition. AP Weeps We No...
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Two Georgia Men Plead Guilty in $550,000 New York Film Tax Credit Scam
NM Woman Pleads Guilty in $3.9 Million Medicaid Transportation Fraud Scheme
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
OPINION

How Medicare’s Prescription Drug ‘Negotiation’ Provisions Will Harm Patients

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
How Medicare’s Prescription Drug ‘Negotiation’ Provisions Will Harm Patients

If anyone had any doubt that the Biden administration and the Left are hellbent on a government takeover of health care, they need only read the new lawsuits against the Medicare prescription drug “negotiation” provisions Democrats in Congress rammed through last year. Those suits lay out in exquisite detail the ways in which progressives want to micro-manage the health care system.

Advertisement

In recent weeks, several drug manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have filed suits in federal court seeking to halt the drug “negotiation” provisions. The suits explain how the federal government is unconstitutionally attempting to dictate prices via what amount to socialistic price controls.

The lawsuits explain how the government dictates every step of the entire “negotiation” process. The law specifies that manufacturers must “agree” to enter into a process that will culminate in a “maximum fair price” that is between 25-60 percent below the current market price. The entire “negotiation” will take place in secret, with manufacturers obligated to hand over to federal authorities any documents Washington bureaucrats request.

If manufacturers fail to participate in this “negotiation”—which guarantees a reduction of at least 25-60 percent of their revenue—or fail to “agree” to these unilateral price cuts, the companies will face ruinous levels of taxation. Specifically, they will face taxes of up to 1,900 percent—19 times the underlying drug’s price. 

This process amounts to a “negotiation” in the same way The Godfather makes offers to his “business partners” that they can’t refuse. Indeed, congressional scorekeepers concluded that the tax penalties would generate no revenue—they would place such an onerous burden on companies that they will have no choice but to accept the government’s demands.

Advertisement

As much of an unconstitutional power grab as this new scheme represents, the real harm will come to patients. Washington bureaucrats imposing price controls sounds like a no-brainer, one in which only pharmaceutical companies lose.

But drastically cutting revenues also means drastically cutting research into the new treatments that can extend, or even save, lives for millions of Americans. For instance, the Food and Drug Administration just approved the first gene therapy to treat a form of muscular dystrophy in children. 

In the nearly six years since the FDA approved the first gene therapy, we have seen the promise and potential of this new technology. But by imposing unilateral and arbitrary price controls, Democrats’ new “negotiation” regime will undermine the revenue streams that can make the promise of innovative therapies a reality. As appealing as it sounds, this “negotiation” mechanism amounts to the killing the goose that lays the golden egg for American patients.

And where did all the savings from these de facto price controls go? Not to preserve Medicare—a program scheduled to become insolvent in just a few short years. Instead, Democrats diverted the savings to fund 87,000 new IRS agents and a variety of climate pork-barrel projects. You read that right: Democrats took money allocated to health care for seniors and redirected it into subsidies for expensive Teslas.

Advertisement

Diverting Medicare funds for climate pork sounds like bad policy—and it is. But it merely reflects how the Left views government as its personal plaything, full of slush funds it can plunder as it pleases. Unfortunately, however, American patients will suffer the harm from this bad policy prescription.
 
Mary Vought ( @MaryVought ) is the founder of Vought Strategies and a senior fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement