Iran's New Leader Breaks Silence, Issues Threats Against US and Arab Neighbors
Gavin Newsom Is Crushing the Field in This 2028 Preview
Corrupt Illinois Mayor Thinks She Can Win in Georgia As a Republican
The Old Dominion University Shooter Has Been ID'd and It Looks Like Islamic...
After Threatening ICE Agents, a Wisconsin Man Enters the FO Stage
Democrats Are Attacking Hegseth's Supposed Steak Budget. They'll Hate This Next Number.
UPDATE: Suspected MI Synagogue Shooter Engaged by Security, Reportedly Dead
Check Out What London Is Now Recommending City Buses Carry for Some Unspoken...
Gunman Dead After Opening Fire at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia
Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They...
Fetterman Goes Off on Fellow Democrats: Why Can’t They Just Admit Operation Epic...
The White House Pushes Back on Reports That Iran Could Be Targeting the...
President Trump Unloads on Thomas Massie at Kentucky Rally: ‘We Gotta Get Rid...
Tim Burchett Blasts ‘Snobs’ Attacking Trump DHS Nominee Markwayne Mullin Over Lack of...
Trans Mania Sweeps New Mexico Schools – Even Elementaries Will ‘Affirm’ Gender Choices
OPINION

President Calls Iran Law “Advisory” Only

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
President Calls Iran Law “Advisory” Only

Two weeks ago I warned that the President might sign legislation barring Iranian terrorists from the UN, but with caveats. Sadly, this is what happened.

Iran recently nominated a known terrorist to the UN and Senator Ted Cruz led a bipartisan bill to stop the terrorist from entering the US, even if the terrorist was a supposed “diplomat.” Cruz’s efforts paid off when the vote for his bill was unanimous in both houses of Congress.

Advertisement

Before the bill reached the President’s desk I wrote in the following article http://townhall.com/columnists/larryprovost/2014/04/10/cruz-control-stopping-islamic-terrorists-at-the-un-n1822421

“It remains to be seen if President Obama will sign this bill. If so, will he sign it willingly or with a whole bunch of caveats about how the right maneuvered into foreign policy, hijacked Congress, or any other of the proverbial yawns that lead Iran to have the audacity and hope that they could nominate a known terrorist to the United Nations and get away with it?”

The President did sign the bill and could have used the signing as an unambiguous opportunity to denounce this latest attempt by Iran to challenge the civilized world. Instead the President signed the bill, with little fanfare, and remarkably accused Congress of circumventing the Constitution. The President signed the law but only took it to be an “advisory” opinion meaning that the President retained the power to reject and approve ambassadors.

If the President had issue with Congress’ power surely he could have told the Congress in a different fashion and in a way that did not take away from sending the strongest message to Iran. Certainly he would not have distracted from the intent of the bill by saying he renders a law, that he just signed after unanimous approval from both houses of Congress, as merely advisory? Further, The President could also have used this as a bipartisan moment for unity, to deliver on his message of ushering in a better tone in politics.

Advertisement

Related:

IRAN TED CRUZ

Iran, a nation that has major unfinished business with the United States, nominates a terrorist to come to the UN and the President used a bill passed unanimously by both houses of Congress to accuse Congress of usurping his constitutional power.

The President, with his great communication skills, knows the news cycle and what it will pick up and emphasize. Sadly, so does Iran.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement