White House Won't Rule Out Tapping Strategic Oil Reserve...Again
Memphis Braces for Potential Riots When Police Footage Is Released
Uncomfortably, Tyre Nichols Was Killed By Black Police Officers – CNN Declares It...
Get Ready for Another Cynical, Useless, Gun-Control Push by Democrats
Anniversary of When Che Guevara 'Closed' on His Beachfront Mansion
Non-Competes Ban is Yet Another Sign of FTC Mission Creep
Time For Palestinian Leaders to End “Pay-to-Slay” Terror Bounties
What Is Normal?
Idaho Scores A Win Against Homeless Encampments
Brett Kavanaugh Expresses His Opinion Of His Supreme Court Colleagues
DeSantis Expresses Disappointment Over Ronna McDaniel's RNC Leadership
The WH Is Getting Good At Keeping Biden From Having to Answer Questions...
Latest Twitter Files Reveal Particularly Damning Revelations on How Russia Narrative Was W...
New Poll Shows Biden’s Approval Rating for 2022
Memphis Police Release Brutal Video Footage

Specter Is Gone: Now What?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

On one hand, the ousting of Democratic turncoat Arlen Specter can be viewed as a boon for tea party politics. On the other hand, it could make his seat harder for Republicans to win back in November.

Republican candidate Pat Toomey polled 50%-38% against Specter one week before the Democratic primary. Toomey polled 42%-40% against primary winner Joe Sestak. No polls have been conducted since the election to see how many of those Specter supporters will now turn to Sestak since Sestak won the primary, but even if it’s a small number, Toomey could be in trouble.

Michelle Malkin

The election of Democrat Mark Critz in the Pennsylvania special election to fill the seat previously held by deceased Rep. John Murtha (D) only complicates this scenario. Critz beat Republican Tim Burns by a whopping 8 points, and if the rest of the state follows along, the GOP could be in for an uphill Senate battle.

But there’s another side to the coin. Specter was a Washington politician if there ever was one, and Democrats are the party in power. Toomey cut his teeth on an anti-Washington, anti-tax agenda as a 4-year president of the Club for Growth, and is designing his campaign against the Democratic Congress’ tax-and-spend agenda.

This means that Toomey is far more different from Sestak than he was from Specter. Specter, for all of his foibles, was perceived as farther to the right than Sestak and might have enjoyed some of Pennsylvania’s center-right support. That could go to Toomey, now, as independents identify more strongly with Toomey’s conservative alternative.

That’s the line Toomey’s camp is using after the Specter defeat.

“Specter lost mainly because the left wing of the Demnocratic party didn’t see him as viable,” said Tim Kelly, a spokesman for Toomey’s campaign. “In Sestak they nominated a poster child for the left wing of the Democratic party.”

Kelly pointed out that Sestak has voted almost 100% of the time with Nancy Pelosi, including the hot button issues of bailouts, health care, and tax increases.

“He goes further than even most Democrats in Congress,” said Kelly. “The Democratic primary voters really got what they wanted when they went for Joe Sestak instead of Arlen Specter.”

Now all that remains to be seen is whether voters will go for Sestak instead of Toomey. But whoever, wins, Specter is out, and it’s no secret why.

“Specter, 80 years old and having spent five terms in the Senate, was a living and breathing embodiment of the traits that voters across the country seem fed up with these days,” wrote Chris Cillezza of the Washington Post, shortly after Sestak’s victory.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video