When New York’s new mayor vowed to replace rugged individualism with collectivism, he echoed an ideology history has already tested—and buried. Ayn Rand warned us what happens when societies punish excellence. In 2026, New York chose to learn the lesson anyway.
On January 1, 2026, in his inaugural address as Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani stated it plainly: “We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism.” This was not a flourish or a metaphor gone astray. It was a governing declaration—delivered from the seat of American commerce and offered as the philosophical blueprint for how the nation’s largest city would now be run—Socialist (cough, cough—Communist).
History has heard this language before—and it has always ended the same way.
Ayn Rand handed us the playbook so we would recognize communism before it arrived in polite language—but New York shrugged, closed the book, and installed it as Mayor on January 1, 2026.
Rand, a Russian-born American novelist and philosopher who fled Bolshevik Russia, published Atlas Shrugged in 1957, less than four decades after the Russian Revolution destroyed the country she escaped. She did not write from theory. She wrote from memory. She had watched “collectivism” move from slogan to policy to ruin—ambition criminalized, excellence punished, entire societies reduced to fear, queues, and silence.
Atlas Shrugged was not speculative fiction. It was diagnosis. And it was a warning.
Individualism Is Not Frigid—It Is Generative
New York City was not built by committees or centralized planners. It was built by individuals—often abrasive, frequently difficult, relentlessly driven—who took risks, built enterprises, and refused to wait for permission.
From Cornelius Vanderbilt to Estée Lauder. From immigrant garment workers who became manufacturers to financiers who pulled the city back from bankruptcy in the 1970s. From artists who transformed abandoned neighborhoods to engineers who made vertical living possible.
Recommended
This is not theory. It is history.
Rugged individualism is not cold. It is productive. It creates the surplus—economic, cultural, technological—that collectivist systems later attempt to seize while pretending it appeared on its own.
Rand called this objectivity: the principle that reality exists independent of feelings, and that production must precede redistribution. You cannot redistribute what does not exist. And what exists only exists because someone created it first.
Always someone. Never “the collective.”
John Galt Is Not Fiction—He Is a Pattern
Critics dismiss Atlas Shrugged by calling John Galt “just a character.” That dismissal is the mistake.
John Galt is an engineer—a builder, a problem-solver, the kind of person modern society quietly depends on but rarely celebrates. When the system decides that his intelligence belongs to everyone but himself—when success becomes guilt and competence becomes liability—Galt does something entirely rational.
He withdraws.
Not violently. Not theatrically. He simply stops cooperating with his own exploitation.
What follows is not sabotage, but decay by absence. Trains stop running. Factories close. Cities hollow out—not because they are attacked, but because the people who made them function are gone.
This is not allegory. It is cause and effect.
We call it capital flight. Brain drain. Talent exodus.
New York is living it. And it will get worse.
The Pattern Repeats—Every Time
Every collectivist experiment—collectivism being the dress rehearsal for communism—follows the same arc: moral denunciation of success, centralization of power, punitive taxation and regulation, exit of talent and capital, and finally decline.
Innovation does not argue. It leaves.
Detroit tried it. San Francisco is living it. Caracas perfected it.
Collectivism does not fail because people are selfish.
It fails because it denies reality.
But its damage does not stop at economics.
Collectivism does not fracture societies by accident; it fractures them on purpose. Division creates chaos, and chaos is the pretext for control. Because collectivist systems cannot survive accountability, they require an enemy—someone to blame when promises collapse and scarcity spreads. Citizens are sorted into moral classes, loyalty is rewarded, dissent is suspect, and the state presents itself as the only force capable of restoring order. Unity is promised.
And this pattern is no longer theoretical.
One of Zohran Mamdani’s earliest acts as mayor was to revoke three executive orders issued by former Mayor Eric Adams that codified protections for Jewish New Yorkers—measures enacted to confront rising antisemitism within city institutions and to restrain overtly anti-Israel activism in municipal leadership. Their removal was not neutral housekeeping; it was a signal. Collectivist systems do not need to name enemies outright—they simply withdraw protection and let resentment do the work. History shows how quickly that vacuum fills, and how reliably Jews become targets once moral clarity is abandoned.
This is not coincidence. It is mechanism.
Collectivism converts economic failure into moral accusation. It teaches citizens to see neighbors as competitors for state favor rather than collaborators in creation. Trust erodes. Fear replaces solidarity. Violence becomes thinkable—then tolerable—then inevitable.
Poverty follows, not as an accident, but as a feature. Scarcity keeps populations dependent. Chaos justifies control. Fear becomes the currency of governance.
The Part We Were Told Could Never Happen Here
In 2026, Americans are watching what they were assured could never happen—the visible dismantling of the American Dream, not in a failed state, but in New York City of all places. The city that once magnetized ambition will now repel it. The city that rewarded risk will now penalize it.
This is not merely economic. It is civilizational. It’s our way of life.
Across the West, a quiet convergence has formed. Islamic extremists joining with bad-actor nations like China, power-seeking states like Qatar, and domestic movements on the far left and far right—different aesthetics, same effect—find common cause in weakening the Enlightenment ideals that place reason above dogma and the individual above the state.
This is not conspiracy. It is alignment of interests.
Islamist ideologues have said it openly for decades: Western individualism is decadent. Liberty is corrosive. Objectivity is a threat. The strategy is not conquest by force, but by fatigue—until collapse is mistaken for compassion and submission is reframed as virtue.
Collectivism prepares the ground. It dissolves responsibility. It conditions obedience. It teaches people to surrender agency while believing they are doing something good.
Which brings us back to Zohran Mamdani—who has said plainly that he will govern as a socialist. History supplies the translation. There is no version of socialism that does not move, inevitably, toward communism.
As we move into the midterms and beyond, New York will not be the exception—it will be the template. Expect more Mamdanis, in different wrappings, elevated into positions of power across the country.
So the question is no longer literary. It is literal.
Who is John Galt?
He is the entrepreneur leaving Manhattan. He is the engineer declining to build where excellence is punished. He is the taxpayer who decides the math—and the morality—no longer work.
He is not a character. He is a consequence.
Civilizations do not announce their collapse with explosions; they whisper it through policies that punish excellence, sanctify grievance, and teach a once-free people to mistake surrender for virtue.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member