A Democrat Senator Just Got Thrown Out of Noem's Press Conference
DHS Kristi Noem Just Blew Up a Dem Senator's Sob Story About How...
Appeals Court Hands Trump Victory Over Federal Judge Trying to Stop Mass Deportations
Justice Department Alleges This State Lawmaker Used a Biden-Themed Username to Distribute...
The Abortion Pill Lie: 40,960 Emergency Room Visits in Five Years
Elizabeth Warren Just Made the Most Ridiculous Demand of Trump
Scott Jennings Expertly Lays Out Why People Are Fleeing California
The Big Beautiful Shake-Up in Higher Ed
ISIS or ICE? Take a Guess Which One NYC Rioters Chose.
'Oh No, Not Work!' Progressives Mock the Very People They Claim to Fight...
Florida Sheriff Warns 'We Will Kill You'
OMB Director Projects Budget Bill Will Cut Deficit by $1.4T
Humanitarian Group Attacked by Hamas in Gaza Rightfully Blames Hamas
Walz Refuses to Apologize After Calling ICE Agents 'Donald Trump's Modern-Day Gestapo'
Trump Fires Off on 'Numbskull' Jerome Powell Again
OPINION

At SF Schools, the Kids Are All Right

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Is there such a thing as being too politically correct in San Francisco? Yes -- but a public official has to overreach drastically to hit that mark. Everett Middle School principal Lena Van Haren did just that when she chose to withhold the results of her school's Oct. 9 student council election because students had elected too many white kids. "It's not OK for a school that is really, really diverse to have the student representatives majority white," Van Haren told the San Francisco Chronicle's Jill Tucker as her decision made national news. On Monday, Van Haren finally released the names of the winners.
Advertisement

Van Haren insists that she never intended to interfere with the results; she just wanted to wait to release them until the school had developed a plan to increase the student council's diversity. One possible remedy would be to add seats so that African-American and Latino children are better-represented. And: "I think it still can be a teachable moment." Problem: I don't think Van Haren understands that she's the one who has a whole lot to learn.

Before Van Haren released the results, student Sebastian Kaplan told KRON-TV school administrators say they "want everyone's voice to be heard" but then, when they don't like the results, don't respect students' choices. It didn't seem to matter, noted Kaplan, who later learned he won the coveted slot of seventh-grade representative, that "the whole school voted for those people."

Parent Todd David believes that Van Haren is "a good person" -- with the best of intentions -- who "screwed this up royally." No lie. She didn't like the election results, so she did not release them. "How can you say that, in the name of social justice, we're going to withhold election results?" David asked. Van Haren claimed that she withheld the results so that the school could have a conversation. How can students have an informed discussion when they don't know who won?

Advertisement

The progressive David told me that he could be open to the school's creating extra seats to make the student council more inclusive. I worry that if Everett were to add seats to include African-Americans and Latinos, that would send a message that underrepresented minority students cannot succeed without special breaks. The more you think about it the more the idea seems downright demeaning.

There's another not-so-subtle message in this story: Black kids are supposed to vote for black kids. Likewise Latinos. If they don't vote for their own kind, it doesn't matter whom they support. As David noted, Van Haren suggests that "a white student can't be representative of a Latino student." He added, "I'm not sure that the students see it that way." Many young teens have moved beyond racial designations.

If a student body that is 56 percent Latino and 9 percent African-American votes the top four slots to whites, Asians and mixed-race students, who is Van Haren (who also is white) to say it is wrong? I'd call her attitude -- mmm -- paternalistic. The principal told KTVU-TV she wants her students to be "agents of change." Guess what. They are.

One last point. San Francisco is a city where dogs outnumber children. City Hall has been desperate to think up schemes to keep families with children in the city -- and to persuade middle-class and affluent parents to send their children to public schools. Everett succeeded in attracting such families, and their reward is to be disrespected.

Advertisement

In a letter to the "Everett family community," Van Haren said the school leadership team wanted to respond "in a way that makes everyone feel valued." Bunk. Van Haren's actions devalued the success of top student council vote-getters and the choices made by students who supported them.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement