A CBS News Report From Over 40 Years Ago Proves Global Warming Is...
Legal Circus Involving Five Americans in Turks and Caicos Could Have Been Avoided...
Does This Tweet From a Former Obama Aide Mean That Dems Are Panicking...
Did Joe Biden Fall Asleep at a Memorial Day Ceremony?
These Dems Were Too Busy Coddling Terrorists to Know What Memorial Day Means
Here's What Jason Kelce Told His Wife When She Was Venting About Harrison...
The CCP Is None Too Pleased a U.S. Delegation Is in Taiwan
Why the U.S. 'Must Provide Deterrence' to Taiwan Amid Escalating CCP Aggression
(Corporate) Charity Cases
Recognizing Palestine
Here's How the Biden Administration Is Reportedly Handling Iran Nuclear Deal
Here's What Squad Members Think Memorial Day Is About
Pete Hegseth Reveals the Stakes, Need to 'Save' the Pentagon After Military Labeled...
How Do New Yorkers Feel About Pro-Hamas Campus Chaos? Here's What a New...
Newsom Signs Radical Pro-Abortion Legislation in Response to Arizona’s Pro-Life Law
OPINION

The Laffer Curve Strikes Again and More Mooching Julia

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

I periodically explain the principles of the Laffer Curve, particularly in hopes that I will educate lawmakers that higher tax rates are a bad idea – even if they wind up generating additional revenue.

Advertisement

Obama’s proposed class-warfare tax hikes, for instance, might pull in some extra loot for the political class to redistribute. But is it a good idea to give the politicians more money if the economy loses $5 of private output for every $1 of added tax revenue?

This is why it is never a good idea to even think about setting tax rates near the revenue-maximizing level.



Sadly, many leftists don’t recognize this tradeoff. They act as if the private sector is some never-ending pinata that is forever capable of disgorging more money if subjected to enough beatings.

But parts of the federal government are waking up to reality. Here’s some of what the Government Accountability Office discovered when investigating the impact of some tobacco tax hikes implemented a few years ago.

Monthly sales of pipe tobacco increased from approximately 240,000 pounds in January 2009 to over 3 million pounds in September 2011, while roll-your-own tobacco dropped from about 2 million pounds to 315,000 pounds. For the same months, large cigar sales increased from 411 million to over 1 billion cigars, while small cigars dropped from about 430 million to 60 million cigars. According to government, industry, and nongovernmental organization representatives, many roll-your-own tobacco and small cigar manufacturers shifted to the lower-taxed products after CHIPRA to avoid paying higher taxes. …GAO estimates that federal revenue losses due to market shifts from roll-your-own to pipe tobacco and from small to large cigars range from about $615 million to $1.1 billion for the same period.

Advertisement

Since the government supposedly was going to get an extra $6 billion-plus from the legislation, this is not one of those rare examples of a tax increase leading to less revenue. But the government is losing 10 percent-20 percent of the extra loot that politicians initially expected.

This chart, from the GAO study, shows the dramatic impact of the tax hike on specific segments of the tobacco market.

To summarize, big tax hikes on cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, and small cigars turned out to be good news for sellers of pipe tobacco and large cigars.

Or, to be more precise, it is good short-run news. It’s probably just a matter of time before the politicians focus on this “loophole” that enables some consumers to protect themselves against federal rapaciousness. Indeed, the GAO study recommended to Congress that

…it should consider modifying tobacco tax rates to eliminate significant tax differentials between similar products. Specifically, Congress should consider equalizing tax rates on roll-your-own and pipe tobacco and, in consultation with Treasury, also consider options for reducing tax avoidance due to tax differentials between small and large cigars.

Needless to say, if lawmakers decide to “eliminate significant tax differentials” and “equaliz[e] tax rates,” you can safely bet that they’ll decide that some tax rates should go up.

Advertisement

What about solving the alleged problem by lowering the tax rates that are high? Those of you who have followed my writings on international tax policy already know the answer to that question.

More Mockery of Julia, the Über Moocher

Iowahawk is a blogger who is deservedly famous for political satire, as you can see from this video on the new Government Motors car named after Nancy Pelosi.

Well, he’s at it again, with a parody of Julia, the über-moocher created by the Obama campaign. The whole set is here, and I’ve copied one image below for your enjoyment.

I think you’ll find the whole thing very amusing. Assuming, of course, you don’t think about the consequences of more and more Americans deciding it is okay to mooch and loot their way through life.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos