Norms Only Exist to Protect the Status Quo. Ignore Them.
This GOP Rep Reveals Who She Thinks Is the Biggest Obstacle to Save...
Other Shoe Drops: We Know Why Sen. Ruben Gallego Has Been So Nervous...
Politico Had Swalwell Dead to Rights in 2019. What Happened?
More Details About the Justin Fairfax Murder-Suicide Incident Have Dropped
Watch Scott Jennings Wreck This NYT Reporter's Talking Points on Iran With One...
There Was a Heavy Police Presence for a Reported Shooting Near a Top...
When Dissent Becomes Sabotage: The Rise of the Counter-MAGA Fifth Column
Criminals Are Stealing Billions From America’s Seniors. AARP Is Fighting Back.
Hey, Tucker: Christianity and Islam Have a Long and Very Bitter History
Disposable Democrats
The Media Exploit the Pope As Trump's Public Enemy No. 1
How Hungary Matters
When the Rules Don't Apply to the Rulers
Mamdani’s Government Grocery Store Is an Awful Idea
OPINION

MSM Misses Mark in Second Amendment Debate

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
MSM Misses Mark in Second Amendment Debate

In yesterday’s Washington Post, columnist E.J. Dionne takes President Obama to task for not standing up to "NRA bullies" and not doing enough to restrict the rights of gun owners nationwide. He also levels criticism at NRA for giving the President a metaphorical “slap in the face” by not agreeing to sit down with the President and his administration to seek common ground. Dionne misses the mark badly on several points.

Advertisement

In calling his White House meetings with leading gun-ban proponents, President Obama has called for NRA to “compromise” on Second Amendment and criminal justice issues. But I say there can be no compromise on the freedoms that generations of Americans have fought with their lives to protect.

Of course NRA would refuse to sit down with a group of people who have spent their entire lives working to infringe upon Americans’ Second Amendment freedoms. These folks are on record with their desire to ban firearms, ration gun purchases for law-abiding Americans, and give the anti-gun elitists at the United Nations the authority to regulate the firearms trade and dictate U.S. gun policy.

No doubt they would like a meeting with NRA, but it isn’t to find common ground. Even The Huffington Post acknowledges that the President has already lost control of Congress on the issue of imposing more restrictions on gun owners.

Rather, this phony olive branch is a classic campaign season attempt to defang NRA and mitigate the impact that NRA members and supporters will have on the 2012 Presidential Election. And make no mistake, that impact will be huge.

The President has indeed lost control of Congress on the gun issue. He lost control after the 2010 midterm elections, where 22 million NRA members and supporters (according to a recent Zogby poll) turned out to vote against any candidate remotely affiliated with President Obama and his anti-gun ideology.

Advertisement

When the dust cleared on November 2 last year, 11 new Senators were A-rated by NRA on Second Amendment issues, one was B-rated, and eight F and D-rated Senators were either defeated, retired or resigned in 2010. The 112th Congress contains 48 A-rated Senators, three B-rated, and just 32 F-rated Senators, 14 of whom are up for reelection next year.

On the House side, we helped elect 227 NRA-endorsed Representatives. In the 112th Congress, 85 newly elected House members were A-rated by NRA on Second Amendment issues, and 10 F and D-rated congressmen were defeated by voters. In all but one race where an NRA endorsed candidate lost, a pro-gun challenger replaced him.

President Obama and his team haven’t had a change of heart on the importance of our Second Amendment rights. They just want to stop another 2010 from happening in 2012. NRA members won’t be so easily fooled.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement