Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
House Republicans Want to Know Why Ilhan Omar's Income Jumped by 140 Times...
UN Report Says One of the Deadliest Threats to US National Security Is...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
'Brass-Knuckled Hypocrisy:' Even the Washington Post Is Slamming Virginia Democrats' Redis...
This Viral Super Bowl Halftime Story About Bad Bunny's Grammy Was Completely False
John Kasich Called Bad Bunny's Show a Celebration of Latino Culture. Did He...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Here Is the Real Reason Bad Bunny Is Anti-American
We Didn't Think Progressives Could Make LA Any Worse, but They Can
OPINION

Saving The Planet But The Economy? Not So Much

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Well, world leaders finally wrapped up their conference to save the world via a plan that caps global temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial revolution levels. The plan essentially demands developed nations to slow down their economies in order to emit less greenhouse gases. As a form of compensation, they would pay developing nations $100.0 billion annually to limit their own economic progress. I am not sure if China is considered a developed or developing nation; apparently, it has pledged economic aid and to one day curb its emissions output.

Advertisement

Watching these ‘leaders’ congratulate themselves, as the world’s economy teeters on disaster, was hard to believe or digest.

This week, it’s all about the Federal Reserve and the first rate hike in almost ten years. Looking back in history, the first rate hike after a rate-cutting cycle, has been followed by major rallies. However, the market has always been lower before such hikes, in part to the moves being telegraphed.

More recently, the market has been higher one year after change and much higher the second year.

First Hike

One Year Change

Two Year Change

June 30, 2004

+4.5

+11.4

June 30, 1999

+6.0

-9.9

March 25, 1997

+26.7

+48.0

February 4, 1994

+6.9

+42.1

There is no doubt, because of how long it has been without a hike rate, and suspicions around the motivations of the Fed, that this time, we could see more near-term volatility than normal.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement