Steve Cohen, TN's Lone Democrat, Announces He's Not Seeking Re-Election
Dexter Taylor Shows Why New York's Anti-Gunners Can't Be Taken Seriously
Trump Just Clowned 'Vegan' James Talarico Into Oblivion With These Remarks
Gavin Newsom’s Former Chief of Staff Cops to Massive Fraud, Tax Scam, and...
Tim Walz Called Steve Scalise a 'Bootlicker' and Scalise's Response Was Perfect
The Justice Department Found Yale Discriminated Against White, Asian Med School Applicants
The Massachusetts Judge Who Gave Cambridge Gunman a Light Sentence Knew He Was...
As Gavin Newsom Touts CA's Education Spending, Spot What He Doesn't Brag About
If Democrats Care About 'Black Representation,' Why Are They Silent About Frederica Wilson...
Why It’s Time to Disown Tucker and Megyn
Judge Sues Illinois Supreme Court for Unconstitutional Dismissal, Violation of Free Speech...
The CIA Lands in Havana: Trump Sends a Direct Message to the Cuban...
Greg Gutfeld Mocks Whoopi Goldberg After She Accuses Trump of Castrating the United...
Here's How Seriously the US Took Digital Security on President Trump's Trip to...
Nithya Raman Wants to Ban What? See Her Latest Proposed Fire Prevention Policy
OPINION

Saving The Planet But The Economy? Not So Much

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Saving The Planet But The Economy? Not So Much

Well, world leaders finally wrapped up their conference to save the world via a plan that caps global temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial revolution levels. The plan essentially demands developed nations to slow down their economies in order to emit less greenhouse gases. As a form of compensation, they would pay developing nations $100.0 billion annually to limit their own economic progress. I am not sure if China is considered a developed or developing nation; apparently, it has pledged economic aid and to one day curb its emissions output.

Advertisement

Watching these ‘leaders’ congratulate themselves, as the world’s economy teeters on disaster, was hard to believe or digest.

This week, it’s all about the Federal Reserve and the first rate hike in almost ten years. Looking back in history, the first rate hike after a rate-cutting cycle, has been followed by major rallies. However, the market has always been lower before such hikes, in part to the moves being telegraphed.

More recently, the market has been higher one year after change and much higher the second year.

First Hike

One Year Change

Two Year Change

June 30, 2004

+4.5

+11.4

June 30, 1999

+6.0

-9.9

March 25, 1997

+26.7

+48.0

February 4, 1994

+6.9

+42.1

There is no doubt, because of how long it has been without a hike rate, and suspicions around the motivations of the Fed, that this time, we could see more near-term volatility than normal.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement