This Media Outlet Just Sued the Pentagon Over its New Policy
Tim Walz Can Dish It Out, but He Can't Take It
Guess How Many Democrats Voted Against Protecting Our Schools From Chinese Influence
Pope Leo Tells Europeans Worried About Islam to Be Less Fearful
Occam's Bazooka
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
Democratic Lawmakers Big Mad That Trump Admin is Fighting NarcoTerrorists
Trump Admin Sweeping Minneapolis For Illegals After Somali Fraud Exposed
Maryland Man Sentenced for Scheme Helping Foreign IT Workers Pose as U.S. Citizens
Arizona Father-Son Duo Sentenced for Massive Cross-Border Narcotics and Money Laundering S...
Two Miami Men Get 57 Months for Nationwide Sale of Diverted HIV and...
Federal Jury Finds Texas Resident Guilty in $150K PEMEX Bribery Plot
Another Person Stabbed on Charlotte Light Rail; Illegal Alien Arrested
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
OPINION

Ellison Ignores Africans Enslaved in Muslim Lands

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Despite the fact that Keith Ellison spent only a short time with the Nation of Islam, he seems to share with NOI’s leader, Louis Farrakhan, a disturbing conundrum: How, as a black man who is a Muslim, and a potential political leader of American liberalism, does he relate to today’s black slaves in bondage in Muslim lands -- in Sudan, Mauritania and Nigeria?

Advertisement

The answer, it seems with Ellison as with Farrakhan, is to ignore or deny the facts and abandon the slaves.

Indeed, Ellison’s model seems to be Louis Farrakhan, who was caught in a vicious fight over Sudanese slaves a little over two decades ago.

Short version: In 1994, an African Muslim from Mauritania –– Mohammed Athie –– and I broke the story of a modern-day slave trade in Mauritania and Sudan, in The New York Times. We reported that “perhaps 300,000” African Muslims were still serving Arab and Berber masters.

“Black Africans in Mauritania were converted to Islam more than 100 years ago,” we wrote, “but while the Koran forbids the enslavement of fellow Muslims, in this country race outranks religious doctrine. These people are chattel: used for labor, sex, and breeding. They may be exchanged for camels, trucks, guns or money. Their children are the property of the master.”

In Sudan, Africa’s largest country, we reported that slavery was “making a comeback, the result of a 12-year-old “holy war” waged by the Muslim north against the black Christian and animist south. Arab militias, armed by the Government, raid villages, mostly those of the Dinka tribe, shoot the men and enslave the women and children.

These are kept as personal property or marched north and sold.” We based our reports on government documents, human rights publications, and a stunning interview with a UN official.

Advertisement

Soon after the Times story broke, PBS’s Tony Brown Show, the most popular black news program at the time, invited Mohammed and I to speak about slavery. Immediately after our appearance, we were attacked by Farrakhan’s spokesman who denied that blacks served Arab masters in Sudan or –– worse from the NOI’s point of view –– that black Muslims served Arab Muslim masters in Mauritania.

A short time later, the Chicago Tribune’s Clarence Page reported that Farrakhan was being funded in part by Arab despot Muammar Gadhafi.

It was at a press conference in Washington, DC in 1996 that Farrakhan was asked most directly about reports of slavery in Sudan. According to the New York Times, he angrily challenged the reporter: “If slavery exists, go… to Sudan, and come back and tell the American people what you found.”

The Baltimore Sun sent two reporters to Sudan. They found and liberated slaves, and published a special four-page insert in the paper’s weekend edition. Farrakhan refused their request for an subsequent interview.

Farrakhan has always said that slavery in Sudan and Mauritania was a Zionist lie. But it turns out that he met with black South Sudanese leaders in the spring of 1994 who begged him for support –– and to help free the slaves. They wrote that he told them, “When it comes to a choice between religion or the dignity of the black man I will choose my skin.” He betrayed them.

Advertisement

But a small grass roots Christian organization (Christian Solidarity International) and (my own) secular American Anti-Slavery Group worked to redeem tens of thousands of slaves over these years. In March 7, 2012, South Sudan, the world’s newest nation, officially demanded the liberation of 30,000 slaves still held by Arabs in the North.

Still, it is estimated that tens of thousands remain in the North. Not to mention Mauritania’s black Muslim slaves and more recently Boko Haram’s slaves in Nigeria which from time to get receive fleeting attention.

As far as we know, no one has asked Keith Ellison about his silence concerning blacks who are today bought and sold by Arabs and Muslims in Sudan, Mauritania and Nigeria. If he is going to lead the party of American liberalism, he surely should commit to becoming the slaves’ most vociferous champion -- whether they are owned by Muslims or not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement