Why Most Airports in the DC Area Are Shut Down Right Now
So, That's How the Old Dominion University Terrorist Was Able to Obtain a...
Yes, This NYT Headline Is Real...and They Appear to Have a Muslim Terrorist...
We Got Some More Manpower Heading to the Middle East
CNN's Kaitlin Collins Set Up Scott Jennings Perfectly to Torch the Biden Administration
My Word, Ms. Spanberger, What Fresh Hell Is This Tweet?
Did We Avoid Another Terrorist Attack This Week? This Arrest in Texas Makes...
Does Retaliation Against the United States Mean We Shouldn't Wage War Against Our...
Pete Hegseth Blasts Reports That the United States Did Not Plan on Iran...
11 Indian Nationals Charged in Alleged Scheme Staging Armed Robberies to Obtain U.S....
Trump Says U.S. Has 'Obliterated' Every Military Target on Kharg Island
Good Guy With a Gun Helped Stop Synagogue Attack in Michigan
VICTORY: Jury Reaches Shocking Verdict in Texas Antifa Terrorism Case
Jury Convicts 9 Antifa Operatives in Texas Riot, Shooting at ICE Facility
Former Nevada County Commissioner Indicted in Alleged $500K COVID Relief Fraud
OPINION

And Then There Was One!

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
And Then There Was One!

So Bloomberg does a survey of 67 economists around the nation and they all come to the same conclusion. I’m not sure whether it was a direct oversight or simply that my questionnaire was lost in the mail. The reason I say this is because the headline that “100% of economists think yields will rise within six months” has a much sexier ring than “67 out of 68 economists think yields will rise within six months”.

Advertisement

One pundit said that literally maybe one economist in the whole country is straddling the bullish/bearish divide and the rest are bearish. Not this economist, sir! I am loudly bullish. I am the one. I am loudly bullish on falling interest rates. I am the one.

The problem in surveying economists is very much like the National Football League that simply recycles its head coaches with an occasional outside breakthrough. In this instance, the same economists are queried again and again and like the lemmings continue to walk hand in hand toward the cliffs. Why should any mainstream economist

think outside the box, after all they’re paid to stay with the group. Any derivative from the norm would bring unwanted attention and that is not an economist’s goal in life. Be as inconspicuous as possible by blending in with everyone else and then occasionally pop up on CNBC. But really, 100%?

I used to think it was unconscionable for stock analysts to all agree to buy or hold a stock and not one recommending a sell. I can never remember Kodak going from 75 to bankruptcy and any analyst ever saying sell it.

So simply put, there are more reasons to believe that the economy’s so called recovery is a myth and thus facilitating lower rates than drinking the Kool-Aid to here comes the good times. From housing to employment, corporate earnings to wages, the pattern is forming and it is not pretty. Slow, slower, slowest continues to be the mantra and is enveloping the world at least for the bottom 99%.

Advertisement

Hidden in all of this is the central banks greatest fear-deflation. Of course, with deflation comes much lower interest rates regardless of what Janet, Mario, or 67 economists have to say.

I know the textbooks say higher rates, higher inflation and a surging economy. Unfortunately those textbooks have either been written or read by the collection of 67 which is why no one, save one, stepped out and said anything different.

I think I’ll go check my mailbox now. Perhaps my Bloomberg questionnaire simply got delayed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement